That is a logical fallacy. Saving would actually mean it is not a financial priority. Priority indicates time. You put this item first. It is ahead of everything else. By definition something you're saving for is put on the back burner. You stuff away whatever money is left over from the priority items.
That was factually incorrect. If you want to argue that, quote me and state specifics.
I never said that. You are arguing something you made up. The fact remains, if you set a goal for equipment, get a little money in your hand and go spend it on something you did not orginally want, you are not an enthusiast. It's not logically debatable. You guys have literally had to lie and spin what I said to try to argue it. It's laughable.
If I skip the skars, I'll have no bass for however long it takes me to achieve the xcons, where as I can take about a month out of that time frame to use for the skars, and have bass until I can afford the xcons. Not only that, I can just sell the skars to help towards the xcons. Plus it's not like its junk equipment either. Hell I may not even go with the xcons and just send the skars to SPL Audio to do his magic.
So the cost of the skars would take a month of savings? This means based on the cost of both, that you will only be getting the skars for a month as well. So just go without the skars for a month and get the xcons. You won't get what you paid for the skars so you will lose money and for what? A month? It's not good logic.... at all. Wait for what you want, especially if it is such a short amount of time like you say.
So you don't really know what you want... you just want to spend some money. Gotcha.
What I've said is perfectly logical, and if you say it applies to you, then you need to show how the logic is flawed. So far, you haven't.
Again, since you cannot make a logical or factual argument, yet you've surmised that you are guilty of what I've said and you're butthurt you have tried to change the subject in a desperate attempt to feel better about yourself.
My electrical as of right now can handle the power I put on the skars. Whereas if I go with the xcon, I have to buy quite a few other things which will take some time to completely put together. As my current setup got stolen I'd like to have something to hold me over until I can go with the xcons.
He's not saying he doesn't know what he wants, he's saying he might be happy with the Skar's and not even feel the need to upgrade the the xcon's
So according to you, because a subwoofer has a particular rms rating, you HAVE to apply that much power to it? I just want to make sure I understand what you are saying.
"until I can achieve the goal....." No matter what you say, you achieve this goal MUCH MUCH sooner if you simply save your money until you're sure what you want and you have the money to purchase it.
Conversely, why be miserable with a prefab box which might be ok for the skar but will probably **** with xcons? Why not just save the money and do it right the first time? You'll be more miserable without bass after you buy the wrong crap because you couldn't wait to spend your money?
I don't think you are. You are willing to sacrifice quality to get something sooner. That speaks for itself.
AKA he's not sure if he wants the Xcons, aka he doesn't know what he wants... lol
There are no rules. What is to moderate? You are mad because you cannot logically defend your position and you're butthurt because you think you're guilty of what I've said. I understand, but don't lash out and make yourself look MORE foolish with your silly arguments that don't make any sense.
Since you know so much about me, what did I buy? If you do not know, we can say with certainty that this statement is total assumption and bs.
Really? What about the guys who have clicked like on several of my posts, or the people who posted agreeing with me? That would seem to disagree with you wouldn't it? Doesn't that prove that you're lying, since there is a direct contradiction to what you're saying freely available in this thread for everyone to see?
