10" sub Poll

Which 10" sub should I get?


  • Total voters
    14
i wouldnt go much over 1k with your stock electrical,but SMS is right,that 6-900 watts you will get at 1 ohm will be fine and the SQ wont suffer much at all,but remember you need to get a sub that "matches" the output of the amp you are using,as in power handling.for example....if you take a 400 watt sub and give it 900 watts from an amp it will sound like a$$ and you will blow the sub,you need to match the amp and sub,and after that you need to set the gains with a DMM
What is a DMM?

 
What do you do adjust it until the voltage drops?
look at some clamps on this forum of the aspm they put out dirty power period. the dsc is your best option for under 1000 bucks and it runs cool at 1 ohm i have owned a dsc1000 and dsc2000 no problems amazing quality. on a fi ssd at 1000rms with big 3 you will be plenty fine. you dont want the audiopipe if you want effecient clean power.

the re audio is crap, the owners of psi and fi left re audio when they where bought out by us amps and they never been the same again. the incriminators are great but for 195 you can get an ssd for around the same price built to order for a sealed box thats small.

 

---------- Post added at 05:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:21 PM ----------

 

What do you do adjust it until the voltage drops?
the only way to accurately tune an amp is with an oscilloscope

 
The lowest I will run is 2 ohm unless you can convince me that that amp will run ice cold at 1 ohm.
long are the days of class a/b amps running at 1 ohm bridged where you can cook an egg on them //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif. even though i love my orion hcca's. You dont have to worry about this as much anymore. like i said the mb quart dsc is the best 1k under 150 amp around period and runs cool.

 
Would using a dsc1000 to power a fi q10 be underpowering it too much? i guess if i went with the dsc1000 i was wondering if the q10 would sound better than the ssd10.
Also why does psi list double the xmax of everyone else? Do they really have that much excursion?

 
Also why does psi list double the xmax of everyone else? Do they really have that much excursion?
they probably do have that much,does it say 52mm one way or is it 52mm peak-to-peak?im going to say thats peak-to-peak 52mm is 2.13" so i think its peak-to-peak

 
Xmax = 52mm totalUsable excursion = 2.5" total
well there you go you answered your own question lol,some companies use xmax as a total peak-to-peak and some use it as xmax one way,usually if its a high number its p2p,a low number is one way,not all companies specify one way or p2p though so they leave you the consumer to determine for yourself what they mean.

 
Oh. I don't know the difference from peak to peak and one way. Peak to peak is how much it flexes both ways?
yes peak-to-peak is both ways the total excursion in mm ,now to convert that to inches is

mm divided by 25.4 = excursion in inches

1 inch is EXACTLY 25.4 mm

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

sjuddslvrss

10+ year member
Member
Thread starter
sjuddslvrss
Joined
Location
Rochester MN
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
48
Views
2,606
Last reply date
Last reply from
mclerico83
IMG_20260515_202650612_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260515_202732887_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top