Yeah the 3.0 @ 28hz looks best out of the 4. You wouldn't want to tune any lower than that anyway. You should try graphing 30hz to see what you get.I have been back and forth on my subwoofer situation. I love my little P3D4-10 and the thought occurred to me that I could run two of these little *******. So I put the parameters into WinISD and came up with 4 vented boxes... I was thinking that box #1, 3.0 cubic feet and tuned to 28hz looks great... But there are 3 others. Based on these graphs, which looks best to you? 1 ohm - 1200 - 1500w amp so 1000w`ish is what I would throw at them.
I did, It's not too much different than the 28... a lil more boosted from +3db to +4db and shifted right slightly, obviously. Still looks good. I think the 28hz tune would require less tuning in the 3sixty.3 in the end.Yeah the 3.0 @ 28hz looks best out of the 4. You wouldn't want to tune any lower than that anyway. You should try graphing 30hz to see what you get.
No, that is actually a good point... I keep forgetting about that cabin gain thing. I have no way to know, though, what frequencies will be boosted by cabin gain.Just me... I wouldn't tune under 30hz.
Cabin gain will help the low end a ton. Idk... how low is too low?.. for some people it's never low enough I guess.
I understand the whole idea about flattening the response by tuning low, I'd play with volumes to flatten response in conjunction with a lowish tune.No, that is actually a good point... I keep forgetting about that cabin gain thing. I have no way to know, though, what frequencies will be boosted by cabin gain.