Is my sub really an SEXrev.2?

[DaveT 10+ year member]

Thought I typed v.1. I think it's a v.2 just off the pics.

Okay yeah I’m thinking it’s rev 2 I was hoping it might be an older one because dude said his friend had went to order SEs and they sold him the S3X so I was hoping but I’m going to have plenty of options this weekend.

 

[Boomin_tahoe 5,000+ posts]

SEs ducked. So was OK. The xxx was decent the MT slammed..

Have you ever had/owned them? No? So why are you commenting??????????????????????????????

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

I'm still trying to figure out what the SE was ducking and why.

 

[Papermaker85 5,000+ posts]

The triple X was more than decent.

Awe not nearly enough to motor strenght

 

[Papermaker85 5,000+ posts]

Have you ever had/owned them? No? So why are you commenting??????????????????????????????

You are a stupid dumb assume. I owned a SX and XXX

I built a few boxes for SES and MTs. you are stupid beyond words.

 

[YukonXL04]

Yes it's a SEXv2. Not a SE at all. And it's not the the SEXv1

The SEXv1 had a plastic cover over the magnet.

 

[Boomin_tahoe 5,000+ posts]

You are a stupid dumb assume. I owned a SX and XXXI built a few boxes for SES and MTs. you are stupid beyond words.

So what does me being "stupid" have to do with you claiming the SE was junk or in your terms of words "ducking"? Again, you never owned one and making ridiculous stupid opinions again. it was a pretty good driver back int he day when 1st released,...was the middle of the line back then. The world doesn't revolve around you dummy.....just because you have high expectations/standards doesn't mean the older SE series is a bad driver. Get off your high horse.