what sub hits loud and Lowww the best? (Xcon, Ixl, lms-r)?

i didnt mean your setup sounds bad, i just meant it has considerably less output in the higher frequencies than an AE AV sub.

his claims are not all about t/s specs, he goes into details about the designs of the subs and clearly points out where the idmax could be better, and how he made his subs better.

u probably know more about car audio than myself, but when i read about the motor designs, and all of johns posts, it all makes sense to me.

 
i didnt mean your setup sounds bad, i just meant it has considerably less output in the higher frequencies than an AE AV sub.
his claims are not all about t/s specs, he goes into details about the designs of the subs and clearly points out where the idmax could be better, and how he made his subs better.

u probably know more about car audio than myself, but when i read about the motor designs, and all of johns posts, it all makes sense to me.
See that is the problem. It DOES all make sense and the driver SHOULD perform extremely well but a lot have experienced lackluster performance from it. By all means, I do not know everything. I do know quite abit. John's subs perform well in a perfect acoustic environment, ie a room. They seem to have real issues with output at higher frequencies in a less than perfect environment. Maybe there is a solution to this now, I do not know as I have not heard much about the av or ae in general in some time.

 
well im not sure what subs u said people were having troubles with, but im pretty certain the AE AV series was designs for car environment.

i would assume the sub plays just as it is being described, and as it was created, which means it plays better than most at higher frequencies.

however i do believe retards pushing 1000 clipped watts would easily cause problems for the sub.

AE probably rates the sub at a true 1000 watts rms, non clipped, and they dont recommend 1200+ watts on the subs.

where most companies, like sundown rate the sa-12 for 600 watts rms, yet jacob says it will handle 1200 clean watts daily no problem...

 
I am talking about the av. The people who had problems (2 of them at least) are very knowledgeable. Certainly more knowledgeable than me. There was a ton of debate over at CAF, nothing solved the issues. Even John couldn't fix the issue, he just kept sticking to the fact that the box was wrong although that was the exact spec box that he had recommended. It made John seem very shady.

IIRC all of John's driver's are designed for both home/car use. Some are optimized for one or the other. The subs in question that were used were supposedly good for car use.

 
I am talking about the av. The people who had problems (2 of them at least) are very knowledgeable. Certainly more knowledgeable than me. There was a ton of debate over at CAF, nothing solved the issues. Even John couldn't fix the issue, he just kept sticking to the fact that the box was wrong although that was the exact spec box that he had recommended. It made John seem very shady.

IIRC all of John's driver's are designed for both home/car use. Some are optimized for one or the other. The subs in question that were used were supposedly good for car use.
Nothing can be wrong with a box to make it not play high. 60hz and up is all driver effeciency the AV's are over 90db/1w/1m and have super low inductance they WILL play high, up to 2k with that effeciency lol. If someone had an issue with them not playing high, or seeming like they didnt' is because they had ALOT of cabin gain down low and it makes their top end seem quiter. One person who had an issue IIRC, was using 3 cubes+ tuned at like 33hz and didnt' use a subsonic. Yeah, that is going to be a sorta boomy on the low end, especially if your car has alot of gain near 30hz. No car has massive gain up at 80hz, most vehciles have a suckout somewhere between 60 and 90 actually. The guy bitchign about a lack of ouput at 60hz also faced the woofers toward him and didnt' block off the backwave. That's also generally going to cause a suckout somewhere up in that region too. The problem wasn't the subs I can promise you that.

Anyway I've used subs that **** up top. My last sub was an AA avalanche, known for ******* up top and it did. Even a single adire koda 10 had more output from 50hz and up. My current subs are actually 2 AV15h's. Box is 4.7 cubes net tuned at 25hz. Same car as my lowish effeciency Ava with no shorting rings was in The subs are are currently passed at 125hz at 24db's/octave. They play easily to 20hz, 20hz moves my rear deck and back seats 2 inches. They also play 125hz loud enough to keep up with my 97db/1w1m midranges and horns, my fronstage is FAR louder than almost anyone on this forum in the midbass and my AV's keep up fine. Above 125 the subs drop off hard and fast. Why? Because the rear deck holes are only big enough to let in 125hz and below without acting as a lpf. Also I have a good amount of gain at 125hz in my car and actually EQ it down on my fronts.

Anyway john never insisted the box was the issue. He insisted people are looking for something that doesn't exist. If you build a ported box tuned low in a car you WILL NOT get flat response up until 80z. Cabin gain makes that an impossibilty. I have to cut 4-5db's to get a flat response in my vehicle and I dont' have the world sbest gain by any means. If you want a somewhat flat response out of the box an AV15h sealed actually does a good job. It begins rolling off by 65hz so it will counter cabin gain, that plus it's high effeciency up top lead to flatish response with no EQ.

If you know how to work around cabin gain then the AV's are fine for car use. They do great in smaller ported boxes as you can port them, tune low and not end up beign super boomy with cabin gain included. Yeah they'll have a strong low end, but not a 15db peak like you get with say a DD sub or AQ. They still have a slowly falling response even ported, ideal for car use, either H or X. People seem to think car audio drivers are actually designed to sound good in a car, they aren't. Car audio branded speakers are designed to do one thing, take abuse because most car audio fans are dumb and run 2x rated power and no filters on everything. If you run t/s specs and model most "car audio" subs, they shoudl sound like **** in a car and most of them do. "Ideal" boxes are really just boom boxes that will slam between 34-45 and then pretty much die. At least in the boomer crowd category, the "SQ" subs are the exact opposite. Small sealed box with a terribly high Q so all sorts of ringing and even cabin gain won't fix the lack of low end. However, the coils can stil handle 2x what they claim thermally and you can't bottom it out in a box that size.

Anyway not trying to come off as a **** on any of this, it's just frustrating to hear misinformation about this whole thing. There is no magic trick to make a sub play up high. It's simplyit's baseline effeciency and how much power the coil can handle. Other than that you just have to balance out how much low end the box gives you with how much cabin gain you have. Cabin gain is mostly down from 50 and down, so that's where you don't need as much bass from the box. AV's are actually very good at giving this response assumign you face your box either towards the tail of the trunk to prevent 60hz cancellation (true of ANY sub) or face it forward and seal off the back. (SPl competitors do this alot). This is basic car acoustics that has pretty much been shown to be true 99% of the time. The AV woofers have T/S parameters that make themselves very good for car usage, both for SPL or SQ.

Anyway thermally the AV's will take alot fo power. 1200 watts if you keep excuriosn under control is fine. Mechanically they have soft spiders, most car audio companies use stiffer spiders because they know most PPl dont' set gains properly or SSF's properly and will overpower/bottom them out. That's Nicks general trick as far as I know. Build the suspension hard enough it takes alot to bottom it, make it soft bottom when it finally does and his fans are destructive and he knows it. Also make sure it can take 2x whatever you rate it it without melting.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nothing can be wrong with a box to make it not play high. 60hz and up is all driver effeciency the AV's are over 90db/1w/1m and have super low inductance they WILL play high, up to 2k with that effeciency lol. If someone had an issue with them not playing high, or seeming like they didnt' is because they had ALOT of cabin gain down low and it makes their top end seem quiter.
this is what i was saying earlier, just sucked it up with words and the right data.

the subs can mechanically play up to 2k hz, and dude didnt have good output at 80hz? lies.

idmax has lower efficiency so it will **** even more at 80+hz if u want to say the ae av sucks at 80hz, yet so many people love that sub.

 
Perhaps whoever was using the Av's before was actually getting a flatter response than he'd like. Kick drums are often falsely recorded at 45hz so that people with subs can pick up their beats. Most people dont' have good midbasses and real kick drums on good recording that arent' altered are 80hz. Most even good aftermarkets and most peoples ****** high inductance low effeciency subs wont' play 80hz well. If he was used to standard car audio subs and ported alignments, he was used to a 6+db peak at 40hz or so. Anyway if anyone wants vid of my sub vibrating things with a 125hz tone I'm pretty sure i can do it lol.

 
No doubt the av is a low end monster. I just question John and the sub, if the quality control issues have been fixed and the sub is fine now, so be it. I have a sour taste in my mount from the whole ordeal.

Tempest, I understand you aren't trying to be a ****, and none of that sounded harsh in anyway. I am going off of experience my friends had over a year ago. As I said earlier, I just don't feel John handled the whole situation very well.

 
No doubt the av is a low end monster. I just question John and the sub, if the quality control issues have been fixed and the sub is fine now, so be it. I have a sour taste in my mount from the whole ordeal.
Tempest, I understand you aren't trying to be a ****, and none of that sounded harsh in anyway. I am going off of experience my friends had over a year ago. As I said earlier, I just don't feel John handled the whole situation very well.
IDK. I remember John even took the sub Papermaker had basically destroyed and still metered it doing like a 125 at 70hz even though it was ripped to shreds. He also offered to for the sub back just to test it and see what was supposedly wrong. Some locals even came down to videotape it. Seems to me people expected them to be built like DD subs and be so overbuilt that you can literally be dumb with them and not break them, they aren't. The spiders are not built to allow you to run no SSF and still not bottom out. Other than that I'd have to assume the top end thing was user error. Too much low end and bad box positioning, even the broken one did what it was supposed to do at 70hz when measured with a mic next to the cone. If you dont' get that bass at the headrest it's a positioning issue. As far as John has said he hasn't made any real changes to the AV's since then. He did stop using the softer spiders and exclusively uses the stiffest single spider he has, which was still too soft for some apparenlly lol. He also stopped the lead slap/shorting issue.

Anyway BumpinBuick did quite a bit of SPL style testing after all this happened, agian right after so same subwoofers "We ran a 50sec tone that every second went up 1hz starting at 70hz and ending at 75hz. Obviously cause my car peaks in the high 30s the numbers were not going to be as high but man that thing still gets loud. I got some pictures and i think a video of it as well, uploading it all right now. I want to say it was mid 130s at 70hz. For a box that peaks at 37hz though thats impressive imo. "

Buick abused the hell out of his. 1500 watts at 70hz until the coil smelled, burped over a 146 at 38hz (legal), bassraced like a 144 for a full song. He still didn't break it or find that the drivers T/S shifted in any meaningful way (john measured it in the shop after). Someone else on here has a 12 that he has had no issues with. IMO, there was like 2 ppl that had issues with these drivers and they both simply abused the heck out of them and put them in bad alignments for their goals and wonder why things didnt work.... They were also very vocal about all of it, making it seem much worse than it is. There are lots of these in home theatres running much higher than you ever could run them in a car (400hzish). I honestly haven't seen anyone on a HT forum complain about them, but then again HT guys tend to model boxes and set filters properly.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

Oakland_slappin

Junior Member
Thread starter
Oakland_slappin
Joined
Location
Tha town
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
28
Views
2,233
Last reply date
Last reply from
Cruzer
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top