Soft parts make subs take more power.

Was that directed at you? Calm yourself before you jump the gun kid...

I was supporting your point...

Sensitivity is not a viable way to measure anything really on a sub. Sometimes they use a 10k hz note and measure sensitivity there.... a sub will never see that high of a note if used correctly.

 
Was that directed at you? Calm yourself before you jump the gun kid...
I was supporting your point...

Sensitivity is not a viable way to measure anything really on a sub. Sometimes they use a 10k hz note and measure sensitivity there.... a sub will never see that high of a note if used correctly.
well as u can tell from my response your "support" for saying sensitivity is not a viable way to measure sq was confusing. it could have gone either way.

i simply cleared it up.

i am young, but not as young as you, but i dont mind if u call me kid, i like being young

 
The "standard" frequency for sensitivity is 1000 Hz -- most speakers are measured or calculated this way. This makes it not very useful for sub-woofers.

CMS has nothing to do with it either... Example :

I have a driver with a CMS of 140 uM/N and an Fs of 33 Hz with a Sens of 88.5 dB -- Qts is 0.272 for this example.

If I make the CMS 70 uM/N (twice as stiff) the Fs is now 46.6 Hz but the Sens is still 88.5 dB -- Qts also changed to 0.385

The second driver has more mechanically power handling as it is more difficult to move -- and low frequencies call for significantly more movement than high frequencies.

We can already see why Sensitivity is useless for low frequencies... typically a lower Sens driver (resulting from more mass or a lower motor force factor... not CMS) has MORE low-end extension for a given enclosure volume, actually.

 
While I'm here... I see alot of folks talking about sensitivity and/or MMS as THE spec for SPL woofers. They are not in and of themselves... Sensitivity depends on two specifications for the most part -- motor force factor AND mass.

What is really important here is the ratio of the two... for example if I have a driver with a BL^2/RE of 108 and an MMS of 223 grams the sensitivity is 85.5 dB -- if I take that driver a put a heavier cone on it but also make the magnet enormous for a BL^2/RE of 198 but with a resultant MMS of 301 grams to keep sensitivity at 85.5 dB... which do you think will be louder ? Based on our testing the latter driver will be around a full dB louder -- with an identical sensitivity.

 
Too many variables to even make the most simple of generalizations. There are always exceptions to any kind of rule, normally many exceptions.
soooo...this? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Similar threads

Yeah I had torn one down and used my digital calipers to measure coil size ID & OD and winding height and spiders all had it written down and had...
4
1K
  • Locked
I have aPC250on Ebay right now that works excellent couple days left on it at auction on the cheapies
3
3K
  • Locked
Looking to sell two ZX 1500.1 not working lots of good parts that are hard to come bye as well as a ZX 650X4 Also not working lots of good parts...
0
993
Well..How about those Shoes?? High Heels?? Dresses?? Never room in the closet for my stuff. Ya.. Use the Guest Closet???? :LOL: :LOL: 💩...
21
3K

About this thread

sobe3yourself.

10+ year member
lordside gangster
Thread starter
sobe3yourself.
Joined
Location
Orange, CA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
40
Views
6,925
Last reply date
Last reply from
hispls
1715380631101.png

Doxquzme

    May 10, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
20240510_180834.jpg

3toneEYZ

    May 10, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top