What I mean is ...
What parameters or specs do they vary to cause my Alpine SWS-1043D 10" sub (300W RMS/ 900W max) to have an optimum recommended internal enclosure volume of 1.0 cubic foot, whereas a Rockford Fosgate P2D210 10" sub (250W RMS/ 500W max) has an optimum recommended internal enclosure volume of just 0.59 cubic feet?
What parameters or specs do they vary to cause my Alpine SWS-1043D 10" sub (300W RMS/ 900W max) to have an optimum recommended internal enclosure volume of 1.0 cubic foot, whereas a Rockford Fosgate P2D210 10" sub (250W RMS/ 500W max) has an optimum recommended internal enclosure volume of just 0.59 cubic feet?