why that was nice

[Kai Winters 10+ year member]

Shuria law = Man's World

Sort of a sick side of that beer commercial for Man's Law or some such thing.

Interesting you don't hear many American women speaking out about this...Rosie is too busy calling Bush a "war criminal". Heather Mills/McCartney is too busy trying to screw herself out of more of Sir Paul's Pounds, etc.

Imagine all the fun we could have in the USA if we embraced Shuria law and started holding people accountable...woohoo fun fun fun.

 

[mrogowski 5,000+ posts]

The entire 9/11 call, including when the guy notes that the suspects are black, can be heard here:
Personally i think this guy was not justified and should be charged with murder.

Plus he is probably racist, just look at him

There, corrected the picture of the guy for you...

 

[jrerun21 10+ year member]

I say she should have been sentenced to 6 months of daily sodomy. Just hoist her *** on a fence in a compromising position and let all the ****** deviants come out and release their desires. This is 2fold as it will reduce these deviants urges to do this act on innocent women.

Right... or have the ****** deviants forced to sodomize each other... true justice... don't even give them soap to drop... its an unnecessary step.

 

[jrerun21 10+ year member]

Shuria law = Man's WorldSort of a sick side of that beer commercial for Man's Law or some such thing.

Interesting you don't hear many American women speaking out about this...Rosie is too busy calling Bush a "war criminal". Heather Mills/McCartney is too busy trying to screw herself out of more of Sir Paul's Pounds, etc.

Imagine all the fun we could have in the USA if we embraced Shuria law and started holding people accountable...woohoo fun fun fun.

I don't know what Shuria law is... but that Sharia law is just awesome. Let's do a countdown of why we need it... and expedite the implementation please!

10. Islam commands that drinkers and gamblers should be whipped.

9. Islam allows husbands to hit their wives even if the husbands merely fear highhandedness in their wives.

(I'm sure all you macho manly men like that one though)

8. Islam allows an injured plaintiff to exact legal revenge—physical eye for physical eye.

7. Islam commands that a male and female thief must have a hand cut off.

6. Islam commands that highway robbers should be crucified or mutilated.

(You won't catch me driving to be unjustly racially profiled anymore... Oh, maybe I'm the one that shouldn't be worried in this instance.)

5. Islam commands that homosexuals must be executed.

(Half of the forum members would be gonners on that one... sorry...//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif)

4. Islam orders unmarried fornicators to be whipped and adulterers to be stoned to death.

(No more sexy time)

3. Islam orders death for Muslim and possible death for non—Muslim critics of Muhammad and the Quran and even sharia itself.

(And you better not try to have a say in what the government says... )

2. Islam orders apostates to be killed.

Definition: apos·ta·sy

Etymology:

Middle English apostasie, from Late Latin apostasia, from Greek, literally, revolt, from aphistasthai to revolt, from apo- + histasthai to stand — more at stand

Date: 14th century

1 : renunciation of a religious faith

2 : abandonment of a previous loyalty : defection

http://m-w.com/dictionary/apostasy

1. Islam commands offensive and aggressive and unjust jihad.

(Of course we all remember that one from 6 years ago..)

 

[tRidiot 10+ year member]

I've mentioned it twice now, and everyone has conveniently ignored it, so I'll mention it one more time, to see if anyone is man enough to address the fact.

Anyone who breaks into someone's home with the intent of stealing knows without a doubt that there is a possibility they could be killed in the act... this of course excludes those with mental illnesses, I'd say.

Therefore...

The thief already chose to risk his life for the potential (not the guarantee) of material gain. The thief (thieves in this case) already chose to continue with the criminal enterprise, having weighed the value of his own life and found risking it less important than stealing someone else's possessions.

He already made the determination of his life's value.

*Note - I'm not defending the shooter, that point is irrelevant to mine.

 

[jrerun21 10+ year member]

I've mentioned it twice now, and everyone has conveniently ignored it, so I'll mention it one more time, to see if anyone is man enough to address the fact.
Anyone who breaks into someone's home with the intent of stealing knows without a doubt that there is a possibility they could be killed in the act... this of course excludes those with mental illnesses, I'd say.

Therefore...

The thief already chose to risk his life for the potential (not the guarantee) of material gain. The thief (thieves in this case) already chose to continue with the criminal enterprise, having weighed the value of his own life and found risking it less important than stealing someone else's possessions.

He already made the determination of his life's value.

*Note - I'm not defending the shooter, that point is irrelevant to mine.

IT WASN'T HIS HOUSE GETTING BROKEN INTO!

I can make the argument that police should be killed because they know the risk. All firemen coming out of a burning building will automatically have burning wood thrown on them by me... because they already knew the risk.

 

[mrogowski 5,000+ posts]

We all take risks that could end our lives. Every day...

 

[jrerun21 10+ year member]

Exactly, somebody that realizes the risks should immediately impose that risk upon us.

 

[tRidiot 10+ year member]

IT WASN'T HIS HOUSE GETTING BROKEN INTO!
I can make the argument that police should be killed because they know the risk. All firemen coming out of a burning building will automatically have burning wood thrown on them by me... because they already knew the risk.

Dude, you don't even understand the concept. So please... just stop before you give yourself a stroke. lol

I specifically said, I'm not talking about them getting shot by the neighbor... how did you possibly miss that?

 

[jrerun21 10+ year member]

Dude, you don't even understand the concept. So please... just stop before you give yourself a stroke. lol
I specifically said, I'm not talking about them getting shot by the neighbor... how did you possibly miss that?

I understand what you said. If you read the following sentences, its about risk.

 

[jrerun21 10+ year member]

All risk takers have low self-worth values. I better stop skydiving.

 

[tRidiot 10+ year member]

So why are you so hung up on the neighbor? lol

And I didn't say we should immediately initiate the risk in any situation, I'm saying the guy made his choice, he placed a certain value on his own life, and yet, the entire argument above for several pages was about value. lol

 

[22mountaineer 10+ year member]

Of course the racism thing will come up, he said that they were black? So because he described them as black men makes him a racist?

Did he not say if you move I will shoot?

I dont exactly remember the 911 call and I am not going to go back to it but didnt he say something about them being in his yard?

The bastards should have been shot, what if it was your house? What just let them run and get away with it? **** no..

 

[mrogowski 5,000+ posts]

Perhaps these sort of instances should happen more often...

 

[tRidiot 10+ year member]

I think the cops should shoot to kill when people flee the police. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

It's the same risk, the same decision of placing value on your own life.