Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tRidiot" data-source="post: 3546748" data-attributes="member: 569830">I&#039;ve mentioned it twice now, and everyone has conveniently ignored it, so I&#039;ll mention it one more time, to see if anyone is man enough to address the fact.Anyone who breaks into someone&#039;s home with the intent of stealing knows without a doubt that there is a possibility they could be killed in the act... this of course excludes those with mental illnesses, I&#039;d say.Therefore...The thief already chose to risk his life for the potential (not the guarantee) of material gain. The thief (thieves in this case) already chose to continue with the criminal enterprise, having weighed the value of his own life and found risking it less important than stealing someone else&#039;s possessions.He already made the determination of his life&#039;s value.*Note - I&#039;m not defending the shooter, that point is irrelevant to mine.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tRidiot, post: 3546748, member: 569830"] I've mentioned it twice now, and everyone has conveniently ignored it, so I'll mention it one more time, to see if anyone is man enough to address the [B]fact[/B]. Anyone who breaks into someone's home with the intent of stealing [B]knows without a doubt[/B] that there is a possibility they could be killed in the act... this of course excludes those with mental illnesses, I'd say. Therefore... The thief already chose to risk his life for the [B]potential [/B](not the guarantee) of material gain. The thief (thieves in this case) already chose to continue with the criminal enterprise, having weighed the value of his own life and found risking it less important than stealing someone else's possessions. He already made the determination of his life's value. *Note - I'm not defending the shooter, that point is irrelevant to mine. [/QUOTE]

Verification