the hungry are the poor, so your plan would have to involve killing half the poor and feeding that to the other half. just kill all the poor and call it a dayi can get rid of poverty and world hunger........cannibalize the poor
that's stupid. they'll just filter back eventually. the poor are like roaches, you have to exterminate themsend umm to like the north pole or something
Right, it's basically a thug/welfare culture. As much as you joke around with your other threads I think you're right with this one.thats one small part of the argument.
I tried to break it down into manageable parts but i don't think it was enough.
The unique conditions of poverty cause the poor to develop a unique subculture as a way to cope/adapt.
This subculture is passed on generation to generation.
Even when offered opportunity for advancement the poor are unable to take advantage because they have been socialized into the culture of poverty.
Thus, the only solution to poverty is the killing of the poor.
I've given up on your threads... I actually enjoyed your previous threads because your threads stimulate fairly interesting conversations. However, you're to stubborn and narrow minded about the topics you start. Whether you’re just doing it to piss us off or to increase your post count is beyond me, but you're making too many enemies in the process.I'm pretty sure this thread is going to fail. The initial argument is far too complex for anyone to respond to it. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif
that modest proposal on the first page is not serious, it is just showing an outragous way to fix a problem to prove a point about a problem. Read the last paragraph of the modest proposal. I myself had to write one for english class as an assignment this year.