Size Comparison of Nuclear Bombs [PIC]

[Twistid 5,000+ posts]

http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=339291829&size=o

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/graduate.gif.d982460be9f153bb54e5d4cb744f6ae8.gif

Click to read more...

 

[Twistid 5,000+ posts]

http://uncommonpictures.blogspot.com/2007/04/russian-rail-missile-system-photos.html

 

[StealthKill 10+ year member]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/omg.gif.05aa02c3095d6ce9338996654eca0863.gif

Glad my house is super duper bomb proof tho.

 

[Twistid 5,000+ posts]

 

[jmanpc 5,000+ posts]

I'd hit it.

 

[Soler 10+ year member]

dude I really wanna go bomb that train

(not literal bomb but bomb as in graffiti term)

 

[Soler 10+ year member]

http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=339291829&size=o

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/graduate.gif.d982460be9f153bb54e5d4cb744f6ae8.gif

The russians tested it at only 50 MT but it's capable of 100 MT

The heat (from test tzar) could have caused third degree burns at a distance of 100 km. The subsequent mushroom cloud was about 60 km high and 30–40 km wide. The explosion could be seen and felt in Finland, even breaking windows there. Atmospheric focusing caused blast damage up to 1,000 km away. The seismic shock created by the detonation was measurable even on its third passage around the Earth.

holy shit!

 

[Rich B 5,000+ posts]

That train has a woody.

 

[Twistid 5,000+ posts]

http://www.spikedhumor.com/articles/100683/Underwater_Nuke.html?rh=31746

 

[oxygen65]

thats a big bomb

 

[StealthKill 10+ year member]

http://www.spikedhumor.com/articles/100683/Underwater_Nuke.html?rh=31746

Bad ***.

 

[Captain_Ahab 5,000+ posts]

That vid is awesome..

 

[jmanpc 5,000+ posts]

10 bucks says the US is developing (or has developed) something bigger than the tsar bomba, but it's classified.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

10 bucks says the US is developing (or has developed) something bigger than the tsar bomba, but it's classified.

doubt it.

It was pointless and never intended to be used in actual warfare.

We were more pragmatic and didn't need the propaganda victory.. we just actually wanted to win the war.

 

[Dozy_production 10+ year member]

doubt it.
It was pointless and never intended to be used in actual warfare.

We were more pragmatic and didn't need the propaganda victory.. we just actually wanted to win the war.

then you got to ask... are any nuclear weapons really 'meant' for actual warfare, besides the ones used on japan. (including the bunker buster)