Correctly setting gains

Thanks, i'll probably just stick with the 0db tones then. would rather play it safe. And the DD-1 looks really nice but how much more would it get than just using a DMM? I really won't be doing this too many times so don't want to spend too much more than I need.

 
Thanks, i'll probably just stick with the 0db tones then. would rather play it safe. And the DD-1 looks really nice but how much more would it get than just using a DMM? I really won't be doing this too many times so don't want to spend too much more than I need.
Its a huge improvement over the DMM

 
$150 tho really? I understand its good but its just a distortion detector I was thinking it would be like 30-50.
I cant tell you how good my set up sounds now. Everything blends better. I dont even want to run full volume anymore but it can. I dont need to though

 

---------- Post added at 01:45 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:44 AM ----------

 

Everything comes on power when it supposed to

 
I cant tell you how good my set up sounds now. Everything blends better. I dont even want to run full volume anymore but it can. I dont need to though 

---------- Post added at 01:45 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:44 AM ----------

 

Everything comes on power when it supposed to
oh don't get me wrong I want one but $150 is too expensive for me.

 
oh don't get me wrong I want one but $150 is too expensive for me.
Yeah I know how you feel. It's a little steep if I won't be using it much at all. Is there any major downside to a DMM? It'll be pretty close for the most part won't it? I want to get as much as possible without damaging anything but if it's only going to be a little bit more with a DD-1 I think I'll be alright.

 
It may be easier to use than an o-scope, but I wouldn't call it "better". Both a DMM and an o-scope allow the user to set their amps for specific power levels. The DMM requires some level of "faith" that the amp can do a given power level un-clipped, but the o-scope will allow someone to get as much un-clipped power as possible out of any source.

A permanent "real-time" clipping indicator would be nice to have somewhere within my view (one for source, processor, amp). Then I could set the gains at -3 or even -6. Older or poorly-recorded tracks could get full power and I could just use less volume knob on the better-recorded tracks.

 
It may be easier to use than an o-scope, but I wouldn't call it "better". Both a DMM and an o-scope allow the user to set their amps for specific power levels. The DMM requires some level of "faith" that the amp can do a given power level un-clipped, but the o-scope will allow someone to get as much un-clipped power as possible out of any source.
A permanent "real-time" clipping indicator would be nice to have somewhere within my view (one for source, processor, amp). Then I could set the gains at -3 or even -6. Older or poorly-recorded tracks could get full power and I could just use less volume knob on the better-recorded tracks.
I would say its "better" then the little hand held joints. Distortion is not only a clipped sine wave. Stuff you wont be able to make out on a very small screen

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

Chrisk13

10+ year member
Junior Member
Thread starter
Chrisk13
Joined
Location
Bellingham, WA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
27
Views
1,754
Last reply date
Last reply from
Chrisk13
IMG_20260515_202650612_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260515_202732887_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top