I'm not. Apart from the fact that it's something not off-the-shelf for once, those meme drivers have absolutely nothing to offer besides mechanical power handling for the sake of power handling.
Again, do the math yourself and see how much actual output that extra excursion buys you, not much and in the real world you lose that and then some with inefficiency.
It's nice that the consumer market is basically just people who will pay to show off big power ratings numbers and post youtube videos of their sub flapping wildly as they're playing below where their port unloads , but as far as anything truly useful I'm still waiting. I had a pair of LMS4000's for a bit and in a proper box (tuned mid 20hz) I couldn't bottom them out on a Stetsom 7K.
To be fair, I have no actual experience running any Sundown subs so I will take you at your word. I haven't seen any tearing in the numerous videos highlighting these high power builds using high excursion Sundown drivers so I wonder what other variables may have led to the failure, aside from the fact that it sounds like they simply unloaded below tuning under sustained high power and that's simple abuse outside of intended use. But the report of tearing foam surrounds only supports one of my initial qualms with the build on these new Adire drivers. We're at the point now where we can make rubber surrounds of different thicknesses and various profiles that will help with preserving cone area while lending themselves to high excursion and/or low distortion. They can also lend the exact same sensitivity figure and they will last longer. No need for foam anymore but it's cheaper than rubber, that's all. This helps the company's bottom line and that's acceptable as long as you're not charging premium prices on the driver. Because if you are, the way I see it, at that point you're getting over on your customer by incorporating a level of built-in obsolescence in the form of a surround that will knowingly fail and require the replacement parts that the company will surely offer you at a "fair" market price. But even if you choose to get them from someone other than the OEM, I see these foam surround cones being offered for like $30-$60 in some places. Each! I can't respect any of that. It's paper and foam for fu
cks sake, and likely Chines at that. Now if the required surround for your special recipe of T/S specs is foam, and it's musical, and it's big enough to offer a balance of design that will prevent it from ever pulling tight and experience the type of stress that could tear it, then okay. But the surround and spider that is being offered on the new Brahma can most certainly be pulled completely tight within it's thermal ratings and will most certainly need replacement down the road, and the company is going to tell you that it's not covered under warranty because it will be considered over-excursion abuse outside of intended use. Pretty senseless IMHO since this is all based on,
and marketed as, a low distortion, high excursion driver. It's not a high thermal, low excursion type of driver intended to drive a vent under very high sustained power. No. With sustained high power it will hit thermal compression like a brick wall, much in the same way the 3" LMS drivers do (but not for the same reasons). Because both types of drivers are intended for dynamic musical conditions experiencing only momentary bursts of high power that would more likely stress the driver in a mechanical way if they were implemented correctly in any given application.
But back to the Sundown thing, I can really appreciate how much advancement and potential there is in some of those motors, and much of my statement about being impressed was based on that alone. My mind instantly goes to "that would make for a great underhung driver" when I see many of his offerings, but I know that's not his intended market. I feel like it's not really his fault for how the entire lineup has turned into this meme driver that you describe. If he's in touch with the demographic and that's what the masses want, which is to be able to abuse their equipment, then I guess he's done what's necessary by designing things in a direction that gives the masses what they want, but in a way that will also help to protect himself from too many warranty claims. Sounds like they occasionally still give up the ghost, though? Hard to believe with those stiff spiders and insane excursion potentials. But people...
I'm with you, though, on the other points you make about the extra power handling and excursion possibly coming at a cost of some efficiency. I'm not really trying to debate that too much, especially as the sensitivity on my current sub (also an LMS4000) is like 80-82dB and I'm only feeding it a real-world 1200w-1500w so do the math on that one, lol. I'm not loud but I am most decidedly visceral. I'm not a huge fan of stiff parts and grossly oversized surrounds for the sake of power handling. But based on very large mounts of personal experience with vast amounts of drivers of all types across the board, I am a huge proponent of softer oversized spiders and reasonably large and specially shaped surrounds for the sake of quieter, low distortion excursion (and sometimes you can have a tight gap in there as a cherry on top but not often). I'm using that excursion for extended bandwidth reaching well below 20Hz, not for greater output. I'm not really touching on the oversized parts thing (relative to the topic of these XBL Adire offerings) for any other reason than quieter excursion and lower distortion for lower powered musical systems. Because by now, I'm sure you know I'm not a numbers guy and efficiency is one of the last things that I concern myself with when it comes to subwoofers. And for that matter, XBL, LMS, or any other linear BL drivers shouldn't be the first choice of anyone attempting to get loud, for obvious reasons. They've already forsaken a good chunk of efficiency for the sake of linearity, so again, the parts chosen for these drivers should be for the quietest, most dynamic operation possible
without being prone to unnecessary failure. That much is owed to anyone willing to pay high prices for these types of low distortion drivers, it should literally be a given.
You and I actually agree on quite a few fronts but we're working toward different goals so it's no surprise that we have some differing views on driver build quality and that's okay, it's just discussion. I think we're both probably pretty
damn good in our respective approaches and I have not doubt I would be impressed with your setup, knowing all along that it's not anything I would ever personally shoot for. I'm certain you would find yourself saying something similar if you could hear my setup, "sounds bloody great but it's not near loud enough", lol. But I can produce absolutely pure tones (no distortion) with complete authority down to 12-15Hz in a way that will remind you that there
actually is plenty of content down that low in many different types of recordings, new and old. It's just that most people don't extract them and include them in the overall presentation. Those frequencies have mostly been labeled as wasteful, cut out and cast aside in the quest for high power SPL presentations and that's fine if that's what a person enjoys. Low distortion, dynamic musicality, and wide bandwidth favoring incredibly low frequency extension, are top of my list my list and I run mostly large sealed enclosures or large EBS type vented alignments so I really require gobs of quiet excursion in order to meet my demands. Whatever output I can get from any given setup, I'm okay with it because that's the trade-off I knew I was making in order to hit my other goals. It's not meter loud but I'm also a seasoned basshead who drives around listening to tones now and then so it's nothing to sneeze at, either. I know I'm not the larger demographic but I know there are plenty more out there like me who want this exact same thing. In any event, quiet oversized soft parts that allow for lots of excursion are pretty important even if you don't intend to ever find the limits of what the driver can do mechanically. But again that's from a reliability and musicality perspective so that the driver can do it's thing without us needing to hear the soft parts pulling tight and making extraneous noises of their own and drawing attention to the presence of a subwoofer. And in rare events for us relatively low-powered musical guys, they can serve to protect the driver from accidental over-excursion by being able to cope with and absorb some of that unintended momentary "abuse". Not the outright abuse one would experience when allowing drivers to see high power below tuning and expecting them to hold up, as you described above. High-powered vented alignments are already running close to thermal limits most of the time so it stands to reason that they are always one short step away from mechanical catastrophe when it comes to unloading. High excursion potential is on your side either way and the market reflects this everywhere you look with those meme drivers, loss of efficiency or not. For daily drivers looking to p
iss-pound their equipment, that trade-off is easily answered with cheap power and so the conundrum never ends. Higher power, stiffer/more spiders, bigger surrounds. Meme, indeed.
But, I reiterate, I do share your view on those drivers for the sake of SPL. Tighter gaps, lower moving mass and the resulting higher efficiency is a large portion of a better way to get there.
I rambled because I am home alone and drinkink mediocre whiskey, I apologize to all.