$5000 sound deadener challenge

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

Guy is a douche, always has been.

nG

 

[DidUHearThat? 10+ year member]

and......
this has already has gone through the courts when it comes to the internet. No case; end of story.

Tell me your real name and I'll make a web site calling you a child molester. You can try and sue me and then my point will be proven. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/redface.gif.62fdbfe1a101588a808c4cff71bcb942.gif

You misunderstood the internet issue. It's IP's and web hosts that are exempted. So the IP or web site cannot be sued for anonymous claims by third parties, the way a newspaper can be held for almost everything that appears in their pages, including third parties.

If you started a web site calling someone a child molester and posted your name, you CAN be sued. Internet does not exempt you from action. It only exempts the website host or IP. Not you.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 generally immunizes from liability parties that create forums on the Internet in which defamation occurs from liability for statements published by third parties. This has the effect of precluding all liability for statements made by anonymous persons on the Internet whose identity cannot be determined.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_defamation_law

This douche published defamatory statements using his known identity. He has no imunity just because it's the internet.

 

[delvryboy 5,000+ posts]

I was probably comparing apples to oranges, which I shouldn't of done.

However, when it comes to the comments about Ant from SS. It needs to be more than just words on a forum regardless of the identity being public. Ant would have to prove that his comment caused him to suffer a significant loss of business.

 

[DidUHearThat? 10+ year member]

I was probably comparing apples to oranges, which I shouldn't of done.
However, when it comes to the comments about Ant from SS. It needs to be more than just words on a forum regardless of the identity being public. Ant would have to prove that his comment caused him to suffer a significant loss of business.

Nope. Read the section in bold.

Defamation
Slander Per Se

Once again, all you would have to prove is that someone had published the statement to a third party. No proof of special damages is required.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slander_and_libel

In the common law tradition, damages for such statements are presumed and do not have to be proven.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...defamation_law

 

[NDMstang65 10+ year member]

He's probably rigged up some sort of active noise control which in all reality is not out of par...it's pretty simple but you'd have to spend some money on a controller and writing a program and do a lot of testing with error sensors and what not (I'm working on stuff like this currently for generators..)

I know **** good and well the material works as far as an acoustical panel resonance dampener...



Now the spectrum I'm not a fan of after doing some testing...but whatever.

 

[donpisto 5,000+ posts]

He's probably rigged up some sort of active noise control which in all reality is not out of par...it's pretty simple but you'd have to spend some money on a controller and writing a program and do a lot of testing with error sensors and what not (I'm working on stuff like this currently for generators..)
I know **** good and well the material works as far as an acoustical panel resonance dampener...

How many layers of spectrum did you do? You need at least 3 layers of it to be somewhat effective. I did it on my wheel wells and it reduced road noise by a lot. Sludge also helps a great deal.

 

[NDMstang65 10+ year member]

It's 1/2" thick and it wouldn't do what i needed it to do in some noise control stuff that i'm working on...it's complicated so i'm not going to go into great detail because I don't think I can..

It worked great on the smaller enclosures, the larger one not so much. I'll have to use some aluminum bars to get rid of the resonance mode of the enclosure...

No fault of the deadener, the matting probably would have worked better in the scenario, however it's in a very hot temperature environment and the stuff falling off concerned me.