$5000 sound deadener challenge

this would never happen, these companies would loose too much money once debunked. if it were maybe a 50k or 500k instead of a 5k challenge you might see some interest from these companies to fight this challenge.

 
His test results wouldn't mean shit in the first place. His methodology is very flawed as there are too many variables left uncontrolled by his conditions (frequency played, vehicle used, items inside, etc..). I could easily build a system that would dominate his tests with or without sound deadener.

I don't think he realizes that his test results can neither confirm or deny his claims.

 
His test results wouldn't mean shit in the first place. His methodology is very flawed as there are too many variables. I could easily build a system that would dominate his tests with or without sound deadener.
I don't think he realizes that his test results can neither confirm or deny his claims.
I did not really understand the test -- the goal was to be outside and test for rattles?? If that is the case then the differences in the cars themsleves would be a huge factor. Plus, that really is not the main reason I use deadener since I really don't have a problem with rattles in the first place.

Admittedly I just skimmed.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

nauc

10+ year member
CarAudio.com Veteran
Thread starter
nauc
Joined
Location
USA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
81
Views
4,974
Last reply date
Last reply from
NDMstang65
IMG_0710.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_0709.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top