2 chambers, 2 ports, 1 sub PICS!!

soloXgt
10+ year member

Dinkum Flicka
gettin it loaded sat or sunday. Had a guy at work design and build this for me. All opinions are welcome. From what I am told, one port is tuned to 30hz and the other to 45hz When everything is hooked up, I'll let u guys know how it sounds. O yea, it was finished in bedliner. Opinions welcome....

0131081456a.jpg


0131081612.jpg


0131081623.jpg


0131081805.jpg


0131081940.jpg


0131082219.jpg


 
I really like the simplicity of porting in that design. As complex as it looks that is probably the simplest way to design/tune a dual chamber reflex box. Beautiful work. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 
So all 3 ports share the same dimensions and the difference in tuning is the result of different net volumes of the 2 chambers? Say a standard ported box for the sub needed 60sq" of port, would this box need 2 30sq" ports or 2 60sq"? Looks interesting!

 
i guess this is the reasoning behind this, based on the 35hz design, the tuning will fall between 30hz and somewhere around 45hz...with a pretty flat response (in car) between them....at the loudness of a 45hz or so tune, thats the goal." i'll only be giving it 1000watts when i get it in until i get the new amp

 
i guess this is the reasoning behind this, based on the 35hz design, the tuning will fall between 30hz and somewhere around 45hz...with a pretty flat response (in car) between them....at the loudness of a 45hz or so tune, thats the goal." i'll only be giving it 1000watts when i get it in until i get the new amp
Yea, that's not what happens.

I have built two different enclosures just like this and the result was the same both times. There is no output benefit from the second tuning point. The upper tuning point really just creates a high pressure area behind the cone which limits excursion around the second tuning frequency. There won't be a significant increase in output there though.

The enclosure will mainly act like it is in an enclosure that has a volume equal to the smaller chamber and the larger chamber combined tuned to whatever frequency. The tuning frequency will come from the total port area on the outside and from the total volume of both chambers.

I hope it sounds nice as the construction looks pretty good.

 
Yea, that's not what happens.
I have built two different enclosures just like this and the result was the same both times. There is no output benefit from the second tuning point. The upper tuning point really just creates a high pressure area behind the cone which limits excursion around the second tuning frequency. There won't be a significant increase in output there though.

The enclosure will mainly act like it is in an enclosure that has a volume equal to the smaller chamber and the larger chamber combined tuned to whatever frequency. The tuning frequency will come from the total port area on the outside and from the total volume of both chambers.

I hope it sounds nice as the construction looks pretty good.
An excursion limiting ported box:eek:

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

soloXgt

10+ year member
Dinkum Flicka
Thread starter
soloXgt
Joined
Location
Buffalo/Rochester NY
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
25
Views
2,621
Last reply date
Last reply from
PV Audio
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top