Oh I get it. Once your argument started breaking down, you started diverting the topic, making vague answers that dont really mean anything, and portray it as a joke you never really cared about anyway. That's called a cop out. Considering you make these threads so often, I really expected a higher level of argument from you. You started pretty strong, but you really fizzled out at the end. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wave.gif.002382ce7d7c19757ab945cc69819de1.gif
typin a lot must mean ur rite huh?Dont sweat it, he's beyond the point of actually addressing the issues at hand any more. Now he's into 'save face and get out of this not looking stupid' mode. But give credit where credit is due, he tried.
he's debating fine i think. made some intelligent points. the problem is, in my opinion, that alot of liberal arguments start from a dishonest premise in the first place. republicans don't want to kick out every mexican and never allow any in, but over 1/2 the arguments are made from that premise on the left. nobody wants to ban mexicans. do humans cause signicant global warming, or is the sun most of the issue? i attest that we could go back to the stone age, and not affect global warming one way or another, so to argue anything else is a waste of time until we get past that question. what happens? that is turned somehow into me not caring about the environment at all, and the argument continues dishonestly from there. there is no way to honestly debate with people who skip the first step and go right into some emotionally driven, logic lacking rant they heard from al gore.How about copy/pasting/photochopping a few more pics just to show us exactly how little you care. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
Again, I really expected a higher level of debate from you. Keep practicing, I'll check back on your debate skills in another couple months.
Why do you hate the environment so? Clearly you hate puppies and kittens. Nobody hates puppies and kittens! Your opinions are no longer valid here.he's debating fine i think. made some intelligent points. the problem is, in my opinion, that alot of liberal arguments start from a dishonest premise in the first place. republicans don't want to kick out every mexican and never allow any in, but over 1/2 the arguments are made from that premise on the left. nobody wants to ban mexicans. do humans cause signicant global warming, or is the sun most of the issue? i attest that we could go back to the stone age, and not affect global warming one way or another, so to argue anything else is a waste of time until we get past that question. what happens? that is turned somehow into me not caring about the environment at all, and the argument continues dishonestly from there. there is no way to honestly debate with people who skip the first step and go right into some emotionally driven, logic lacking rant they heard from al gore.
i watched george bush eat one online, and have always hated kittens since.That's understandable... but kittens? You're sick.
Its called a filibuster. I can produce pie charts as well.typin a lot must mean ur rite huh?
That's because you've never tried one with A-1 steak sauce.i watched george bush eat one online, and have always hated kittens since.
Since we are being serious now, that thermometer looks like my penis when Faulk gives me attention.
i'm starting to discredit people for not spelling things right. that's much easier than arguing with someone more educated than i. good ole saul alinsky can get me out of any jam. he's the new jesus.typin a lot must mean ur rite huh?
where's the picture of him dead pvssy? and you call yourself deerhunt.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/nono.gif.eca61d170185779e0921b0faa9704973.gif
where's the picture of him dead pvssy? and you call yourself deerhunt.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/nono.gif.eca61d170185779e0921b0faa9704973.gif