why that was nice

Should i start using crystal meth?

  • Sure...its not that bad...

    Votes: 93 62.0%
  • Just say no!

    Votes: 57 38.0%

  • Total voters
    150
Oh I get it. Once your argument started breaking down, you started diverting the topic, making vague answers that dont really mean anything, and portray it as a joke you never really cared about anyway. That's called a cop out. Considering you make these threads so often, I really expected a higher level of argument from you. You started pretty strong, but you really fizzled out at the end. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wave.gif.002382ce7d7c19757ab945cc69819de1.gif
Dont sweat it, he's beyond the point of actually addressing the issues at hand any more. Now he's into 'save face and get out of this not looking stupid' mode. But give credit where credit is due, he tried.
typin a lot must mean ur rite huh?

 
How about copy/pasting/photochopping a few more pics just to show us exactly how little you care. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
Again, I really expected a higher level of debate from you. Keep practicing, I'll check back on your debate skills in another couple months.
he's debating fine i think. made some intelligent points. the problem is, in my opinion, that alot of liberal arguments start from a dishonest premise in the first place. republicans don't want to kick out every mexican and never allow any in, but over 1/2 the arguments are made from that premise on the left. nobody wants to ban mexicans. do humans cause signicant global warming, or is the sun most of the issue? i attest that we could go back to the stone age, and not affect global warming one way or another, so to argue anything else is a waste of time until we get past that question. what happens? that is turned somehow into me not caring about the environment at all, and the argument continues dishonestly from there. there is no way to honestly debate with people who skip the first step and go right into some emotionally driven, logic lacking rant they heard from al gore.

 
he's debating fine i think. made some intelligent points. the problem is, in my opinion, that alot of liberal arguments start from a dishonest premise in the first place. republicans don't want to kick out every mexican and never allow any in, but over 1/2 the arguments are made from that premise on the left. nobody wants to ban mexicans. do humans cause signicant global warming, or is the sun most of the issue? i attest that we could go back to the stone age, and not affect global warming one way or another, so to argue anything else is a waste of time until we get past that question. what happens? that is turned somehow into me not caring about the environment at all, and the argument continues dishonestly from there. there is no way to honestly debate with people who skip the first step and go right into some emotionally driven, logic lacking rant they heard from al gore.
Why do you hate the environment so? Clearly you hate puppies and kittens. Nobody hates puppies and kittens! Your opinions are no longer valid here.

 
typin a lot must mean ur rite huh?
Its called a filibuster. I can produce pie charts as well.
Besides, you dont care, remember? Copy/paste/edit another pic to prove just how little you care. Or post some more research you've done today, just to prove your lack of interest in the topic.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 
ICAM0005-2.jpg
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

faulkton

5,000+ posts
CarAudio.com Veteran
Thread starter
faulkton
Joined
Location
neverland
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
31,921
Views
604,032
Last reply date
Last reply from
natisfynest
IMG_0710.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_0709.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top