why that was nice

Should i start using crystal meth?

  • Sure...its not that bad...

    Votes: 93 62.0%
  • Just say no!

    Votes: 57 38.0%

  • Total voters
    150
this healthcare situation is gonna get real ugly..I think Obama should have sat on this more before rushing to push it through..i mean he has 4 YEARS in office, it's only month 8.

too much, too fast

 
Yeah, because what we're discussing isn't even single-payer health care. It's a public options, which is WAY different. Basically means setting up a tax-funded insurance company, as opposed to socializing medicine.
But let's even say the proposal WAS universal health care a la Canada or France. Sure that'd make your taxes go up, but that would be MORE than off-set by the fact that the chunk of your money normally going toward your private insurance (be it deducted from your paycheck or something you pay monthly). Your taxes might go up $1000 but you'd be keeping about $2300 that normally went toward insurance.


well I think you misunderstood, i this statement was not related to the previous post about the canadian health care system. Honestly globally countries feel sad for the US and our health care system. American's think that the other countries are inferior and we are the end all be all, but peoples way of life in other nations far exceed ours. In some countries they have free delivery doctors. meaning just as we call up to order pizza, they call a doctor and they make free house calls and if its something they cant handle they send an ambulance to get to take you to the hospital and guess what its free. Most of my family on my mothers side lives in Toronto and they maybe pay 15% tax but again dont have to pay for anything medically. On visit to an ER or surgery can cost you your salary. My g/f mother had a kidney transplant and was in the hospital for 4 days and thebill was over $200k. I'd pay more taxes for no health care cost in a heart beat

 
Yeah, because what we're discussing isn't even single-payer health care. It's a public options, which is WAY different. Basically means setting up a tax-funded insurance company, as opposed to socializing medicine.
But let's even say the proposal WAS universal health care a la Canada or France. Sure that'd make your taxes go up, but that would be MORE than off-set by the fact that the chunk of your money normally going toward your private insurance (be it deducted from your paycheck or something you pay monthly). Your taxes might go up $1000 but you'd be keeping about $2300 that normally went toward insurance.
I don't pay $1,000 a year in health insurance.

So whats wrong with a public option?
It depends on how it works.

fuck it, I say all smart people move to canada. that way, the rest of the fucking idiots who dont support this can stay here and die of leukemia.
Smart people won't move to Canada because it's too cold and you can get super rich there. If all smart people supported universal options, wouldn't we already have a universal option? Dumb people don't run shit.

What's the inherent problem of insurance based health care that a public option wouldn't address?
Moral Hazard

ya know, medicare works just fine. its socialized healthcare you're already paying for...
Medicare doesn't work just fine. Why do you think there are problems with reimubrsements and stuff. I'd like to see your justifcation for this.

 
well I think you misunderstood, i this statement was not related to the previous post about the canadian health care system. Honestly globally countries feel sad for the US and our health care system. American's think that the other countries are inferior and we are the end all be all, but peoples way of life in other nations far exceed ours. In some countries they have free delivery doctors. meaning just as we call up to order pizza, they call a doctor and they make free house calls and if its something they cant handle they send an ambulance to get to take you to the hospital and guess what its free. Most of my family on my mothers side lives in Toronto and they maybe pay 15% tax but again dont have to pay for anything medically. On visit to an ER or surgery can cost you your salary. My g/f mother had a kidney transplant and was in the hospital for 4 days and thebill was over $200k. I'd pay more taxes for no health care cost in a heart beat

I am not sure if you realize how stupid this comment is.

 
I never said I want people to starve to death. If people starve to death its their own fault. Not mine. If people were given an incentive to get off their ***, like the threat of starving to death, they would probably do something about it.
If it were going to be handled by the taxpayers, it would have to be handled by a government agency.
So you want a government bureaucrat to decide if grandma starves to death?

And you do want people to starve to death if your government bureaucrat decides they dont want to work.

 
What's the inherent problem of insurance based health care that a public option wouldn't address?
It's more the fact that it isn't complete. Having a limited government-funded insurance pool just creates another insurance company, which may still fall prey to problems in limiting coverage thanks to the light amount of money it actually has to work with, as opposed to full-on single-payer that just trucks along adjusting taxes and such as needed to cover everyone. It's an odd hybrid.

At least that's my feeling.

 
It's more the fact that it isn't complete. Having a limited government-funded insurance pool just creates another insurance company, which may still fall prey to problems in limiting coverage thanks to the light amount of money it actually has to work with, as opposed to full-on single-payer that just trucks along adjusting taxes and such as needed to cover everyone. It's an odd hybrid.
At least that's my feeling.
There is no possible health care program that covers all the people all the time.

 
I'm curious, how would you handle those who choose not to work?
I would propose we provide a minimal assistance program that would provide for bare necessities such as food and shelter.

Not a comfortable lifestyle by any means but enough to keep people from starving to death.

What would you do about people whom your government bureaucrat has decided dont want to work but have children?

Do you want children to starve to death because of their parents?

 
What about the people with severe mental health issues.. like schizophrenia.. and a comorbid drug addiction diagnosis?
Should they starve to death?

I think he means drugs like cocaine, crack, heroine, etc

i agree his comment, if i have to take a drug test to get a job, your lazy *** gotta take a drug test to get some of my money..

 
I personally think they should do away with some of the HIPPA requirements and allow insurance companies to adjust premiums based on the client. We have no problem with discounts for safe drivers. Why not discounts for healthy people?

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

faulkton

5,000+ posts
CarAudio.com Veteran
Thread starter
faulkton
Joined
Location
neverland
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
31,921
Views
604,291
Last reply date
Last reply from
natisfynest
IMG_0710.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_0709.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top