efm80
10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
just a couple quick questions of comparison on what you guys would rather have and would help more in reference to SQ.
Deck 1: 13 band Graphic EQ, time alignment, and tons of crossover points with slope for each channel (ddx812)
Deck 2: 7 band Parametric EQ with 5 custom settings you can create, dsp soundfield (avn6620)
I am really in between with these 2 decks as they are similarily priced and even though the eclipse has the nav I really could care less about it. My true question is I really love a parametric EQ, but have never had T/A on a headunit and have heard good things about what it can do for your imaging and SQ. So would you say a 13 band graphic EQ with T/A would be better in tuning ability and SQ than a 7 band parametric EQ without T/A or vice versa???? thanks for any advice!!!
eddie
Deck 1: 13 band Graphic EQ, time alignment, and tons of crossover points with slope for each channel (ddx812)
Deck 2: 7 band Parametric EQ with 5 custom settings you can create, dsp soundfield (avn6620)
I am really in between with these 2 decks as they are similarily priced and even though the eclipse has the nav I really could care less about it. My true question is I really love a parametric EQ, but have never had T/A on a headunit and have heard good things about what it can do for your imaging and SQ. So would you say a 13 band graphic EQ with T/A would be better in tuning ability and SQ than a 7 band parametric EQ without T/A or vice versa???? thanks for any advice!!!
eddie
