For most situations, you're 100% correct. Id rather get the hell out of a situation then have to go to trial.Hitman;
Yes, they are plenty accurate for self defense. If you have time to aim at someone, then you have time to get away without having to use your gun.
Thats pretty good, and the best thing about it is no wasted time getting sights on target.I can hit a paper target at 10 yds 95% of the time in the hit zone with the point and shoot method.
Understandable, ive just seen a lot of people bring up accuracy as an issue when for a defense type situation it really isnt. Just making sure there wasnt any misunderstanding there.When I said accurate, I was refering to say a Beretta, competition 45 or long barrel revolver. I only list those because they are guns I own or have owned.
Again, understandable. It took me a bit of time to get used to mine. Not to mention a lot of dry-fire shots with a dime on the front sight to keep it still.I can hit torso sized objects at 50 yds with my 357 wheel gun with just a small amount of aim time but not so with a Glock. Granted, I have had much more range time with my wheel gun compared to a Glock.
As for the part in bold, you know as well as I. Carry whatever you shoot best. I love wheel guns and they dont jam. The only downside is it holds 6 rounds, but if someone can take 6 .357 rounds and keep coming at you... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif well I dont think its possible. The Glock IMO is the closest you're going to come to a wheel guns reliability, but with more rounds.
What model revolver do you have anyway?
