Subs with thin tall surround and high xmax

[Lil Poot 5,000+ posts]

i wish my bl's had tall surrounds //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

 

[neonrt 10+ year member]

So this is wrong?
Xmag = Excursion limit due to the magnetic limitations of the driver's motor. Xmag is defined as the displacement at which the BL product has fallen to 70% of its value at the cone's rest position.

Xsus = Excursion limit due to the driver's suspension. Xsus is defined as the point at which the compliance of the suspension has decreased to 25% of the value at the cone's rest position.

If you are familiar don't keep it a secret.Why don't you tell us?

everything is a secret. shhhh.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fro.gif.c695f1f814b01c4ad99fe7f8cccadd29.gif

 

[oxsign 5,000+ posts]

I know you said 15"s, but I have to post it up anyways, 18" FTMFW!!!!!!!!!

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/naughty.gif.94359f346c0f1259df8038d60b41863e.gif And there another one on the way //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/up2something.gif.dd110ecf3ae4b76050d87598f2f8de7c.gif

 

[Lil Poot 5,000+ posts]

thats so badass... i loved my rl-p 12's

 

[SplChoice- 10+ year member]

DD dont say there xmax cause its gets pretty insane

 

[AndonD454 10+ year member]

DD dont say there xmax cause its gets pretty insane

hahaha

 

[azbass 5,000+ posts]

tall surrounds are meh

 

[SplChoice- 10+ year member]

hahaha

haha what? ask em

 

[htownplaya456 10+ year member]

well this is the arc flatline 12" it has a really thin surround and is pretty high from the cone and has 20mm xmax any sorry it aint a 15 but I like the sub a whole lot

http://www.arcaudio.com/arc-05/subwoofers/flat_12d2.htm

 

[luv2bass 10+ year member]

Sweet!

 

[luv2bass 10+ year member]

one of the best looking 18's (front view)

 

[Death By Bass 10+ year member]

haha what? ask em

I would be more inclined to say that they DONT EVEN KNOW what their subs x-max are, and if they do, its so low, they its just embarrassing.

they claim to be an SQ subwoofer, and yet, they cant even tell us the x-max of the woofer? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif

 

[xtremebassjunky 10+ year member]

I would be more inclined to say that they DONT EVEN KNOW what their subs x-max are, and if they do, its so low, they its just embarrassing.
they claim to be an SQ subwoofer, and yet, they cant even tell us the x-max of the woofer? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif

they use a different method for finding xmax...

your an idiot if you think they don't know...

when have they claimed to have sq woofers?

the 9100 is the only one I have heard the sq claim on...

 

[newusername 10+ year member]

they use a different method for finding xmax...

Yes, an inaccurate, comedic, and unaccepted measurement system.

Good article on excursion and Xmax:

http://www.soundsolutionsaudio.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=7113

 

[xtremebassjunky 10+ year member]

In the end hasn't DD proven themselves in the lanes?

I have seen nothing but good results from people who know what they are doing... (eg louisiana_crx)