adulbrich
5,000+ posts
Olive oil un-virginer
Yes, the video is bias. Did the guy who repairs amplifiers say that the Soundqubed amp was indeed better than the Hifonics?
He didn't say they've never been replaced in Aq amps.Its hard to believe that no caps, traces, or FET's have ever been replaced in AQ amps.. really?
The Hifonics/Soundqubed thread on CACO is way longer than this one. I didn't even bother reading it
Ok, thanks for the clarificationHe didn't say they've never been replaced in Aq amps.He said he's never had to replace them on the Aq amps he has repaired.
Did you perform these tests yourself and can provide evidence?Well one obvious difference is the fact a Hifonics won't clamp rated hell even what it does clamped at high level is clipped and SQ does + some and has a more stable signal longer but /shrug other than that I guess they are the samelol
this not until someone does a DIRECT swap from amp to amp and meters it on music, burp, whatever the heck you want. NOT untill i see that and the SQ does more these 2 are almost the same. And i became a SQ nuthugger when i joined this forum never liked hifonics as everyone and there mother runs it here in LA but after seeing this i might just jump on the bandwagon becasue a 200w difference in clean power isnt worth $200 in my eyes.Both amps are going to sound the exact same to your ear so I'm not sure what the big deal is