Newellzie's practical sq build in a 07 g6

[Papermaker85 5,000+ posts]

I follow you except for the 0.22mfd, I have a 0.82, would I have to stack a couple .22's? Also I'm gunna need a bigger Board lol.
Is this a common thing among all companies, cause I was looking at JL Zr's and focal krx3's and the Zr looks like it uses 1 maybe oil it doesn't say but it is bigger. But the krx3's are using def electrolytic cause they are tiny and I forget the amount but have a bigger mfd. even the utopia looks like other then one large one they might idk, I can't get a super clear pic of them so scaling could be off. I'm just comparing cause like these seem to be some of the best speaker systems. Ik there are many others I just was checking out a few. But thanks for your help man and I'll look into maybe stacking and just replacing at least my Electolytic ones cause I think that's the weakest point. Then maybe coils cause there kinda small. And then maybe someday I'll swap out the Mylar.

this is for a 2nd order alignment. slightly different crossover points and a different crossover topology. i personally perfer shallow slopes. its a more natural roll-off IMO and with a little effort you can get it to blend just fine.

sorry i noticed i had the wrong cap for the tweeter..https://www.madisoundspeakerstore.com/supreme-caps/mundorf-15.0-mfd-supreme-caps/

dont see a reason to go active wihen you can have each component bi amps with excellent passives. your CD player should have a decent EQ and time alignment. active alot of times can have phasing issues and unless you have equipment and alot of tuning experience they can be hard to get right. not to mention latency and other problems they can have.. imo i perfect a fine tuned passive system but the digital processing is excellent as well.. people just dont understand the issues with it 99% of the time

 

[Newellzie]

Have you ever been to a concert that has speakers behind you?
Similar to what we are saying, the music should be coming from the front. Your passengers will have no problem hearing the music. Use the rear speakers off HU, run the front active. That way you're still adding to the overall sound but the real staging is coming from where it should, in front of you. Something to marinate on, it's your choice obviously but you should look into it and think about it. We aren't just blurting BS. System looks good besides those small things.

Ik that everyone says it comes from the front hence the upstage system I have. But I think rear fills are also important. But that may just be me.

Anyways I will try to swap to active. So with my 80prs is there a setting I have to change for active or just adjust filters accordingly

Also is this the CDs you mean at lolisatool

http://www.amazon.com/Ultimate-Demonstration-Disc-Critical-Listening/dp/B00002MXUH

And

http://sheffieldlab.com/item.php?item_id=52&category_id=2003

 

[Newellzie]

this is for a 2nd order alignment. slightly different crossover points and a different crossover topology. i personally perfet shallow slopes. its a more natural rolloff IMO and with a little effort you can get it to blend just fine.

Yeah, I'm thinking I'm just going to go active, that was actually my original intent but then I thought I would try to play around with passive. Right now tho I'ma just chill and save money aha

 

[LosIsATool 5,000+ posts]

Yes.

And if they start talking about stuff you don't understand, learn what they are saying

 

[Papermaker85 5,000+ posts]

Have you ever done any critical listening? Are your ears trained?
If SQ is your goal, yes active. If you don't have processing for the rears, lose them.

Sheffield labs test cd

Cheesky ultimate demo cd

Get them and test your setup. Be real with what you are hearing.

what makes digital processing sound better?

 

[LosIsATool 5,000+ posts]

what makes digital processing sound better?

5.1 or 7.1 upmixers. Much fuller imaging. Even without the center channel.

 

[Papermaker85 5,000+ posts]

5.1 or 7.1 upmixers. Much fuller imaging. Even without the center channel.

i want facts and scientific reasoning

 

[TreyE 10+ year member]

i want facts and scientific reasoning

How abouuuuut.......THIS FOR AN ANSWER?!??

 

[LosIsATool 5,000+ posts]

You need scientific reasoning behind surround sound?

 

[Papermaker85 5,000+ posts]

You need scientific reasoning behind surround sound?

no behind the benefits of digital crossover networks.

 

---------- Post added at 08:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:38 PM ----------

 

How abouuuuut.......THIS FOR AN ANSWER?!??

is that your car?

 

[TreyE 10+ year member]

no behind the benefits of digital crossover networks. 

---------- Post added at 08:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:38 PM ----------

 

is that your car?

Yes.

 

[Papermaker85 5,000+ posts]

Yes.

at least its reliable.

 

[LosIsATool 5,000+ posts]

Like having multiple slopes?

You think that's all processing is good for?

 

[TreyE 10+ year member]

at least its reliable.

Haha you're **** right! Resale is great too! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/moon.gif.9d317aec3339ffe7fde0638df52c628a.gif

 

[Papermaker85 5,000+ posts]

Haha you're **** right! Resale is great too! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/moon.gif.9d317aec3339ffe7fde0638df52c628a.gif

how you like those silver flukes? never messed with them. just the seas, peerless and speak scan drivers in mostly home audio systems i've built..

i cant get over the front wheel drive.. they are good cars though.