Really? Do the internet douche bag witch hunters ever take a break and build a life of their own, or do they spend every waking minute trying to play detectives with no viable information for backing. If our country worked the way the internet forums do, 95% of the people in prison would actually be innocent instead of just claiming they are.Looks like you can add selling stolen property to his list of proud achievements: WARNING EBAY USER (TIS10300) SELLS STOLEN PROPERTY !!! - DIYMA.com - Scientific Car Audio - Truth in Sound Quality
First off we use a 10% pot instead of the industry standard of 20%, then we match the pots before using them, and our circuit is very closely matched, there is less than 3 millivolts difference at worst case between the tracking of each channel. SECONDLY, we offer the amps with the option of NO GAIN CONTROL and a dip header for a plug in chip set to set gain EXACTLY to headunit.Can't afford it? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
As I sit here, I can't help but wonder why a so called SQ amplifier only has one gain control. Anyone care to answer that one?
slurp slurpFirst off we use a 10% pot instead of the industry standard of 20%, then we match the pots before using them, and our circuit is very closely matched, there is less than 3 millivolts difference at worst case between the tracking of each channel. SECONDLY, we offer the amps with the option of NO GAIN CONTROL and a dip header for a plug in chip set to set gain EXACTLY to headunit.
It is not the level matching between the channels on the amplifier that I was questioning and I get your point. My point is that without the ability to adjust the gain on each channel, the tweeter that is 46 centimeters from my head is going to play much louder than the tweeter that is 206 centimeters away from my head. That was the reason behind me questioning the single gain since a large number of the amplifiers costing more than $6 USD per watt have one gain per channel of amplification.First off we use a 10% pot instead of the industry standard of 20%, then we match the pots before using them, and our circuit is very closely matched, there is less than 3 millivolts difference at worst case between the tracking of each channel. SECONDLY, we offer the amps with the option of NO GAIN CONTROL and a dip header for a plug in chip set to set gain EXACTLY to headunit.
If this poses a problem for you, you can always buy a head unit that has level controls for each channel. I know my 9960 has them.It is not the level matching between the channels on the amplifier that I was questioning and I get your point. My point is that without the ability to adjust the gain on each channel, the tweeter that is 46 centimeters from my head is going to play much louder than the tweeter that is 206 centimeters away from my head. That was the reason behind me questioning the single gain since a large number of the amplifiers costing more than $6 USD per watt have one gain per channel of amplification.
You hit the nail on the head with your points. If it doesn't fit under the seats or occupies more than 2 cubic feet of my trunk, including the subwoofer enclosure, I don't want it. After all, it's just car audio where unequal path lengths, reflections, refractions, extraneous noise variables, distractions, and multitude of other things get in the way of actually enjoying the music. Instead of chasing the ultimate SQ pipe dream in a freaking car, I just go for making it sound as good as I can knowing full well the limitations of the environment I chose to aggravate myself to no ends with! Speaking of environment, if you don't have control over your listening environment, the battle for SQ is already lost!I've learned alot in this thread...about a wide variety of subjects. I haven't been convinced to buy a new LP amp though. But, I freely admit to not having heard one yet either.
I will say that I have owned a fair number of amplifiers since jumping into the hobby back in 1987. A good 95% of them have sounded very good to excellent. It seems a safe bet that even in 2012 no sonic breakthru has been made that would justify some pretty steep pricepoints. At this point I think we are down to talking about footprint, efficency and electrical demands. Maybe a few bells and whistles thrown in as well. But, nothing that would change the game.
Again, I wish good luck to anyone in America who employs Americans to make American products.
Come on now... How is this thread any different than the typical response to a JL Audio thread where multiple posters eventually jump in and say "There is better for less" 100s of different ways?A massive threadjack and alot of butthurt...?
According to the guys themselves, they state the LP2150 will exceed the 2.2hv in power especially in the lower frequency ranges where the 2.2hv started to drop off. The new amps are supposed to absolutely stomp on all the old amps as far as sound quality but still have the same sonic characteristics as the old amps; just increased in detail.How do they compare to the power and sonic qualities of the old 2.2HVs?
ZOMG, are you admitting that the older amplifiers lacked power output in the low frequency range? Really? After berating me on every forum saying I didn't know what I was talking about while accusing me of making unproven, false accusations when I complained about my problems with the old school Linear Power amplifiers cutting out while reproducing modern electronic music? Say it isn't so...According to the guys themselves, they state the LP2150 will exceed the 2.2hv in power especially in the lower frequency ranges where the 2.2hv started to drop off. The new amps are supposed to absolutely stomp on all the old amps as far as sound quality but still have the same sonic characteristics as the old amps; just increased in detail.