new critical mass sub...

[sundownz Pro Seller]

Ahhh I wasn't trying to prove anything. I don't know a lot about their drivers and obviously as you can tell now nor neo. But it is extremely expensive. And I wasn't aware the LMS ultra wasn't conventional my mistake. ANd I guess I went a bit overboard. I just hate marketing in general so i am biased... But on the same note DD's is convent correct? and they have what 30mm one way. now again The woofers may be great.

DD had around 13mm of x-max when the 9500B was put on the DUMAX, by the 70% BL method. I'm pretty sure their coil to top plate ratio has remained fairly similar over the years so I'd expect anywhere from 13-16mm linear from the new 9500s as well.

But... that really isn't important as to what they are used for -- ported box SPL, quite often right at tuning for competition where excursion is limited. They will also "throw" much farther than that, but it's not linear by any means.

 

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

WELCOME TO 2 YEARS AGO....

nG

 

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

Nor is Xmag....
I wouldn't pay $2000 dollars for this when you can get an LMS-Ultra for less from AudioPulse.

Are you sure?

nG

 

[mrogowski 5,000+ posts]

Looking at the build, the DD's are probably linear beyond 13-16mm. A driver can still have a linear throw even though BL drops below the magic number...

 

[mrogowski 5,000+ posts]

Are you sure?
nG

All he would have to do is save a few of those free "cheques" he keeps getting //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[sundownz Pro Seller]

Looking at the build, the DD's are probably linear beyond 13-16mm. A driver can still have a linear throw even though BL drops below the magic number...

I suppose it varies on how you define linear, I'm going off 70% BL which generally equates to 10% THD. It's hard to tell with DD anyhow... I've seen some really short 9500 coils and some much longer coils, I'm guessing they change quite a few things based on the coil option that is selected so different impedance models may actually have different 70% BL x-max figures.

 

[newusername 10+ year member]

82% seems to be the definition nowadays.

 

[BEELZEBUBER]

I guess it should come as no surprise that this is his 4th username....the other 3 being previously banned......

i guess it shouldn't much of a suprise to everyone here that your a ball tugger and you got a round mouth.

BEELZEBUB LIVES!!!!

http://i241.photobucket.com/albums/ff217/candyhun/*****-sushi-1.jpg

 

[mrogowski 5,000+ posts]

I suppose it varies on how you define linear, I'm going off 70% BL which generally equates to 10% THD. It's hard to tell with DD anyhow... I've seen some really short 9500 coils and some much longer coils, I'm guessing they change quite a few things based on the coil option that is selected so different impedance models may actually have different 70% BL x-max figures.

Yeah, usually when I see the word 'linear' I have always equated that to the physical movement of the cone/coil. Distortion levels are quite ambiguous to begin with, since some can detect distortion at 10% and others will detect it at upwards of 25%.

At least there is one defacto standard that nearly all companies have agreed upon. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[kmanian 5,000+ posts]

i guess it shouldn't much of a suprise to everyone here that your a ball tugger and you got a round mouth.
BEELZEBUB LIVES!!!!

http://i241.photobucket.com/albums/ff217/candyhun/*****-sushi-1.jpg

Someone call a MOD, I think I see a nip!//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif