kinetik battery wireing?

kevin25
10+ year member

Member
I have a 1400 kinetik up front and a 1400 kinetik in the back. It looks as it my local shop ran a power wire to both positives but I dont see a ground wire to ground wire on both batteries. It looks as if they grounded the back battery to the frame. Is this ok? ON the kinetik website they say to run two batteries parellel fun positive to positive and neg to neg..

 
Ok I was worried there for a second. So as long as the front is grounded to the frame, which it is, and the back one is grounded to the frame this is ok? Is this still running them both parellel to each other this was also, and will they both get charged equal by the altenator? Why does there site say to run ground to ground and pos to pos to both batteries? I think there way you are getting a capacity of both batteries and my way I am only getting a capicity of one battery to the system, is this true?

 
Kinetik says to run (-) and (+) from the front to rear batteries because Kinetiks are for serious people and serious competitors know the difference it makes when you ground to the frame and running (-) to (-). There is far less resistance when you run 0 ga from your front battery to the rear battery. Grounding to the frame means using steel, which isn't very conductive compared to copper. And I'm assuming you've already done the big 3 upgrade along with a High output alt? Kinda pointless for two batts if you haven't.

 
If there is a battery in the back of his car well say 13 ft from the front battery. How is making a run 13ft away better off than to the frame which is probably 3ft away?

 
I believe going to the frame would be better eh? It's a much shorter distance. And seeing both batteries are connected to the same frame.... Just makes more since to me. Unless you know something I don't. I'm here to learn.

 
the electricity still has to flow all over the car. so if you give it a direct line to the battery the flow would be more efficient? its still a 13 foot run no matter what type of material used, so why wouldnt you use the least resistive.

am i on the right track?

 
the electricity still has to flow all over the car. so if you give it a direct line to the battery the flow would be more efficient? its still a 13 foot run no matter what type of material used, so why wouldnt you use the least resistive.
am i on the right track?
Yeah, your on the right track. Copper is less resistive compared to the steel frame. A copper wire is a direct line to the battery, where the frame isn't. If you ground to the body the current still has to travel through all the spot welds and body mounts that hold the body panels together, compared to one direct line.

 
Manufactures recommend you ground to your chassis on as short of a wire as possible. The longer your ground wire the stronger the possibility of picking up noise, so they say.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

kevin25

10+ year member
Member
Thread starter
kevin25
Joined
Location
Michigan
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
22
Views
2,144
Last reply date
Last reply from
Racerx250
20260423_214720.jpg

BP1Fanatic

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
20260419_124349.jpg

BP1Fanatic

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top