Is cone area more important? Take this example.
Two 12' 1000 watt RMS subs vs. One 15' 3000 watt RMS sub.
Two 12' 1000 watt RMS subs vs. One 15' 3000 watt RMS sub.
Aren't power hungry subs that take 2-3k really inefficient? Why buy a sub that takes 3k to get it moving vs a sub that only takes 1k to get it moving? It seems like cone area is far more important in a lot of cases. Your car electrical system can only get so big and that determines how many watts RMS you can run.somewhat
True but it usually takes 6-7 cubes for an 18 vs 2-3 cubes for a 12. You get a little more cone area with an 18, but with 2 12s you get more thermal power?I just prefer to buy one larger sub to two smaller because of price. I can get an 18" for 400 bucks that handles the same power and has more cone area than 2 12's when the 12's are 250 a piece.
Also get over twice the cone area.True but it usually takes 6-7 cubes for an 18 vs 2-3 for a 12.
I meant 6-7 cubes for an 18 and 4-6 cubes for 2 12s. I'm curious to know the advantages of having two magnets vs one.Also get over twice the cone area.
We got a response saying somewhat and depends on so many thing, I would like some elaboration? Becasue I'm kind of curios about this as well.
Ohh, gotchaI meant 6-7 cubes for an 18 and 4-6 cubes for 2 12s. I'm curious to know the advantages of having two magnets vs one.
Power handling is directly related to SPL as is cone area.i thought we were talking about power handling? not SPL. things like rms, max those kind of ratings. not sure how we got into cone area and such