OP
DrewRafter
Junior Member
- Thread Starter
- #31
Allright then, pick one between these two, I've narrowed my search between the MTX 801D and the Polk C500.1. Which one would you rather have and why?
i didnt say that i knew what they were. i just laughed when zane made the claim that amplifiers cannot affect sq. thats just not true.
I agree with zane.
The cleanest amp I could find was at best buy. The guy was actually polishing it, it was very clean. No dust, no scratches. I could almost see myself in it (and it was "matte"). One time I saw a real clean amp in a car, then some dust fell on it...
the price tag, man...what part of the amp makes the SQ?
Disregarding Pyramid and the like - there isn't an amp on the market (other than class D) that has a higher THD than, what? 0.1% at rated power - which is at least 10x, some say as high as 30x less than audible distortion. THD isn't worth concerning yourself with.any THD over 2% would be audible to any of us, 75% would be ridiculous
That's just not true. Engineers in the field routinely claim that S/N is only a factor if it's below 40 or 50 - which we all know every amp is well above....a S/N ratio of 90, versus a S/N ratio of 110 is a huge difference, 20 DB is a lot.
Heh...you wouldn't be able to hear a 5% THD unless you were in an anechoic chamber listening to pure test tones //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifany THD over 2% would be audible to any of us, 75% would be ridiculous, not barely noticable and a S/N ratio of 90, versus a S/N ratio of 110 is a huge difference, 20 DB is a lot.
I think the general consensus isn't that RF amps are bad; just that they're not worth the inflated retail price.