XaznKewLguyX 10+ year member bloop 3,526 0 SoCal Jan 9, 2008 #16 yup alum for sure. i think its a tc9 motor. i had one of those..
nismos14 5,000+ posts CarAudio.com Veteran 14,812 4 Jersey Jan 9, 2008 #17 The TI, has a FAT surrround in any form, the alum does not, you got fawked. File a paypal claim if you can.
The TI, has a FAT surrround in any form, the alum does not, you got fawked. File a paypal claim if you can.
OP Rookie_80 10+ year member CarAudio.com Elite 1,885 0 Houston,tx Jan 9, 2008 Thread Starter #18 Once I saw it today i knew it was not SW9122 but I saw pic of 88120TiDVC online and it looked like it. Well anyway. Got it for 149 shipped. should i return it then?
Once I saw it today i knew it was not SW9122 but I saw pic of 88120TiDVC online and it looked like it. Well anyway. Got it for 149 shipped. should i return it then?
OP Rookie_80 10+ year member CarAudio.com Elite 1,885 0 Houston,tx Jan 9, 2008 Thread Starter #20 ngsm13. I don get it. You saying it IS Titanium? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif
ngsm13. I don get it. You saying it IS Titanium? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif
OP Rookie_80 10+ year member CarAudio.com Elite 1,885 0 Houston,tx Jan 9, 2008 Thread Starter #22 I guess that's 5 against 2 (including seller) i just wanted to know for sure before accusing anybody and asking for money back.
I guess that's 5 against 2 (including seller) i just wanted to know for sure before accusing anybody and asking for money back.
ngsm13 5,000+ posts BSEE 41,527 250 Cincinnati, OH Jan 9, 2008 #23 The original Titanium was a TC9... the Aluminum a TC7... IIRC... nG
btdickey99 5,000+ posts I Hate the Tarheels 6,971 0 Burlington, NC Jan 9, 2008 #24 Once I saw it today i knew it was not SW9122 but I saw pic of 88120TiDVC online and it looked like it. Well anyway. Got it for 149 shipped. should i return it then? Click to expand... I wouldnt......Thats still a solid deal for a alum
Once I saw it today i knew it was not SW9122 but I saw pic of 88120TiDVC online and it looked like it. Well anyway. Got it for 149 shipped. should i return it then? Click to expand... I wouldnt......Thats still a solid deal for a alum
OP Rookie_80 10+ year member CarAudio.com Elite 1,885 0 Houston,tx Jan 9, 2008 Thread Starter #25 The original Titanium was a TC9... the Aluminum a TC7... IIRC... nG Click to expand... ngsm13, did you identify TC9 by the pic and how is it different in looks from TC7?
The original Titanium was a TC9... the Aluminum a TC7... IIRC... nG Click to expand... ngsm13, did you identify TC9 by the pic and how is it different in looks from TC7?
skydeaner 10+ year member suede humper 1,227 0 Champaign, IL Jan 9, 2008 #26 I as thinking ti elite so disregard my post lol.
OP Rookie_80 10+ year member CarAudio.com Elite 1,885 0 Houston,tx Jan 9, 2008 Thread Starter #28 and TC9 has 750RMS? Because i read Eclipse 12 Ti has 1500max/750RMS Eclipse 12 Alum 1000max/500RMS (both underrated as i heard)
and TC9 has 750RMS? Because i read Eclipse 12 Ti has 1500max/750RMS Eclipse 12 Alum 1000max/500RMS (both underrated as i heard)
OP Rookie_80 10+ year member CarAudio.com Elite 1,885 0 Houston,tx Jan 9, 2008 Thread Starter #30 if it is TC9--are they as good as SW9122 or weaker? I understand this sub is DVC -- should be able to wire @ 2 or 4 ohms right? My amp is Kicker 750 mono with 891RMS @ 2 ohms
if it is TC9--are they as good as SW9122 or weaker? I understand this sub is DVC -- should be able to wire @ 2 or 4 ohms right? My amp is Kicker 750 mono with 891RMS @ 2 ohms