17" from the bottom //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gifi guess a could go a lil under 6 cubes.(Very to close 6 though) i really dont want to go pass 20 inches depth.
on the first diagram, Letter "D" is the 17" from the hump to the top or from the bottom to the top?
17" from the bottom //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gifand about wood thikness am not sure , i always use 1 inch,
but 3/4 is great.
will do... if i slanted the back... could i push the front in a bit? or would that change things again?am goin to sleep , i will figure that out while sleeping , will reply u back after 12+ hours //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gifu try to figure out a way also, we share idea's //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
yup u can slant the back ,will do... if i slanted the back... could i push the front in a bit? or would that change things again?
yup u can slant the back , for now am tryin to figure out a way to build the port with the least vol.
and yet not an external port.
as far as i know, when calculating port tunning, vol , lenght and area * two ports,What are the effects of having dual port opposed to having 1?
more SPL less SQ? Do you think this setup is overkill?