djdilliodon!
CarAudio.com Elite
Actually, it wasn't that I said I didn't like that statistic, I said I don't like going by the RMS ratings when they use a rather high frequency point baseline for the stat like 110Hz but at the same time provide that the drivers range is much lower (55hz and up for these drivers) AND likely to be crossed closer near the 70-80 Hz crossover point likely in this build.
It's conflates the real RMS that most are going to utilize that size driver for. I's a bit of a catch 22 as it is a relevant crossover point, but kind of deceptive for what the use most likely will be in this case and if one doesn't know why that is relevant, affects the outcome. Just a personal pet peeve, not a critique of the driver's ability.
Since the OP has stated they are not that savvy regarding x-overs, etc., Trying to educate the meaning of the stats relative to the OP's stated end goal for the build. The is a lot of program material in that 80-110 Hz range that will need to be picked up by these midbass drivers given that his sub is going to be in a trunk.
There is actually a standard for power handling testing of component sets and midbass drivers. Usually one of the following is used 60Hz at 24dB/Octave, 80Hz at 18dB/Octave, or 100Hz at 12dB/Octave all high pass. Low bass frequencies don’t really “blow” midbass drivers. Higher bass notes tend to create more heat as cone travel is more limited preventing the cooling affect the cone has while moving. What lower bass frequencies can do is when running drivers free air, they can reach or exceed mechanical limits more easily compared to thermally. Having the coil have a full make out session with the back plate of the motor is never a good thing
. I’ve given up on IB setups long ago after experiencing sealed. It just sounds way better to me overall.
