XXX18 w/ passive radiators...

Just port the god **** thing...
I'm with snova on this one.....

Leave the PR's to the home theater guys. You're not going to gain much SPL over a simple ported design, and if you plan to compete, you have to count your PR's as extra cone area. It's something fun to play around with, I suppose, and you'd probably be the only kid on your block who knows what a passive radiator is, let alone owns one.....

 
I wouldn't do the XXX 18" ported for a daily setup -- the 0.59 Qts isn't looking too favorable on the sub. It may suit your needs for a 70/30 SPL/SQ type setup though.
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif

 
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif
Let me try again... I wouldn't expect the XXX 18" to sound all that great ported with the 0.59 Qts. But if he is more in the market for 70% or more SPL and not all that concerned with SQ then he'll probably be happy with it anyway.

 
Thanks for your suggestions. I still think the PR's have huge potential. Yes the Fs is quite low 23-27 Hz neighborhood, but the low end should sound quite well with PR's. However, this is just speculation.

Cree

 
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't it seem like most of the uses for passive radiators is with 8", 10" and 12" woofers and NOT 18". The desired effect is to have both quick response but let the sub play lower more efficiently without the added strain on the woofer itself.

It is also tougher to tune a passive radiator. You have to add/subtract mass to the centerpiece of the PR and use more equipment. But a lot of that extra effort is because there is not as much information out there to help people tune their PR's as there is with formulas and help for tuning a ported enclosures. Ports are much easier to deal with.

Just port the **** thing!

Not to mention it seems to me that you might have some cancellation issues too.

 
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't it seem like most of the uses for passive radiators is with 8", 10" and 12" woofers and NOT 18". The desired effect is to have both quick response but let the sub play lower more efficiently without the added strain on the woofer itself.
It is also tougher to tune a passive radiator. You have to add/subtract mass to the centerpiece of the PR and use more equipment. But a lot of that extra effort is because there is not as much information out there to help people tune their PR's as there is with formulas and help for tuning a ported enclosures. Ports are much easier to deal with.

Just port the **** thing!

Not to mention it seems to me that you might have some cancellation issues too.
A passive radiator setup has a higher group delay than a vented system. Passive radiators are usually used when ports would be impossible or inconvenient to use - i.e. when the port length would be too long, or when the port air velocity would be too high (chuffing would result).

You get about as much cancellation from a passive radiator as you do from a vent; as you approach the tuning frequency from the higher frequencies, excursion of the driver(s) goes lower and lower since the passive radiator/vent does more of the work, and then it goes higher and higher since you get cancellation from the PR/vent.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

CreeDiddy

10+ year member
Member
Thread starter
CreeDiddy
Joined
Location
Wood Dale, IL 60191
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
16
Views
2,424
Last reply date
Last reply from
stangme01
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top