GoochJuice
Banned
figures. so you are assuming something as well then.in the very first post... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
figures. so you are assuming something as well then.in the very first post... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
i never claimed to be all knowing //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gifBtw hoss, there are more idiots on my side of the arguement than yours....check the poll.. You're not the all knowing //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gifa good point to take into consideration.
it could also be affected if the airplane travels at 88 mph at the exact moment lightning strikes the clocktower.
EXACTLY!!!!!!! you have now figured it out nowOk...now that I understand that a treadmill cant stop a plane, then there is no myth. It's simply "can an airplane take off while moving forward". Of course!
i never claimed to be all knowing //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif
however it is entirely possible (and now that im talking to you i really think its true), that i am completely surrounded by drooling tards on this website.
Because people get stuck on the whole treadmill thing, its basically a riddle.YES I ASSUME THAT THE PLANE IS SUPPOSED TO BE STATIONARY. THAT IS THE POINT. If the plane is allowed to thrust forward, why would there be any question wether it could take off? That defeats the whole purpose of putting it on a treadmill... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
See aboveexactly. why would this even be a myth?
i think if the runway was going the same speed as the plane (not how fast the wheels are rolling) then it couldnt possibly take off seeing as it would have no air speed and no lift
but i dont see how they could possibly make a conveyor belt that could keep up with the planes maximum speed (since the plane would constantly speed up in an attempt to get lift untill it reached maximum speed)
so... if they could make a 1/4 mile long conveyor belt than can spin at 300+mph then the plane cant possibly take off
Edit: after thinking about it the conveyor would have to be going incredibly fast (way faster than the plane, i guess exceeding the limit of how fast the wheels could rotate [i assume there is a limit to this because of friction])
but idk, that just my thoughts on it... ill have to think about it later
Edit#2: i guess im trying to say if they could manage to keep the plane stationary then it couldnt possibly take off... but who knows how fast the conveyor belt would have to be moving to make that happen
Btw hoss, there are more idiots on my side of the arguement than yours....check the poll.. You're not the all knowing //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gifa good point to take into consideration.
it could also be affected if the airplane travels at 88 mph at the exact moment lightning strikes the clocktower.
Some people still dont get it.Ok...now that I understand that a treadmill cant stop a plane, then there is no myth. It's simply "can an airplane take off while moving forward". Of course!
I think I see where the misunderstanding is. The treadmill is *supposed to be* runway length(we will see how they do this). Its not a standing take off. I think this is why the harrier comment was made.
no the plane is under the conveyor belt.I'm a tad cofused. Is the plane travelling at takeoff speed above the conveyor only? Meaning a zero "airspeed"? If so there's no wind speed for lift. If the plane is taking off at an "airspeed" above a treadmill the lift is there.
Kinda tricky wording.