why that was nice

[AlterEgo99 5,000+ posts]

Legal = OK

Illegal = Deport

Not hard...although at present it seems to be for our government. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

Legal = OK
Illegal = Deport

Not hard...although at present it seems to be for our government. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

Given our current limitations there is no way to realistically deport the ones already here.

 

[Mike465 10+ year member]

Haha, that is some funny shit. Wish they would have taken it out of the box to show it. Wonder if the oven door was his or did he take it from someone.

 

[Mike465 10+ year member]

 

[snoopdan 5,000+ posts]

Im sure that new oven doors are worth at least $100

 

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

Oh yah...

ng

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

OK MORON LETS REVIEW. MAYBE PICTURES WILL HELP


YOU CLAIMED IMMIGRATION WAS BAD. I SAID I DISAGREED AND SAID I COULD PROVIDE EVIDENCE. SORRY THAT BOLD FONT WASNT ENOUGH FOR YOU TO CATCH ON



YOU SAID I WAS WRONG SO I POSTED AN ARTICLE.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU WAS WRONG BISH. SORRY U DUM.

Again, You are good at completely ignoring all but what you wish to argue about. RIGHT BEFORE THAT... I CLEARLY SAID "ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION"

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

That coupled with the fact that the vast majority of illegal immigrants (estimated by some to be over 20,000,000) will work for under minimum wage, not pay taxes, and receive services tax dollars pay for. Means that immigration is hurting our economy.

Read the whole statement idiot. And this time don't pick and choose parts just to argue. you are wrong, moronic, and ignorant. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

This "fact" just isn't true. Maybe your small mind can grasp it this way. In the OP two statements were made. The first one was that only an idiot would deny the need for health care reform and was my own assertion. The second was about factors that could potentially contribute to bankruptcy. I simply presented a study on the subject. I NEVER connected the two.
Perhaps in your paranoid and delusional mind you construed some connection between the two statements and created wild hypothetical situations in your head where i provided "theories...implications...evidence" but i assure you this isnt true.

I could have just as easily made a thread with a title "kitties r cute" and then said "kitties die". You'd probably construe that as a claim that God hates kitties or something.

i never said your outlandish creations supported anything.

But its relevance to the discussion cannot be eliminated just because it doesn't conform to your preconceived ideas and values.

The only thing i did was point out your bias.

I NEVER MADE ANY CLAIMS IDIOT

OK I'm done arguing with you in this thread because you clearly realize you no longer have a leg to stand on in this matter and thus like so common on this forum you revert to that age old argument, "well that's not what I meant."

You are not fooling anybody, everyone knows what you meant in the OP and everyone sees that you are an idiot for the above post. Leave while you still can. Its only a matter of time before everyone sees your jargon for the crap it is. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 

[duece212 5,000+ posts]

Given our current limitations there is no way to realistically deport the ones already here.

start deporting and making it harder for illegals to gain access to gov services and I bet alot start going home on their own:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wetback

"By the end of July, over 50,000 immigrants were caught in the two states. Around 488,000 illegal immigrants are claimed to have left voluntarily for fear of being apprehended. By September, 80,000 had been taken into custody in Texas, and the INS estimates that 500,000 to 700,000 had left Texas on their own."

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

But its relevance to the discussion cannot be eliminated just because it doesn't conform to your preconceived ideas and values.

The only thing i did was point out your bias.

On a final note,

My statement was made without bias and without preconceived ideas and values. I am not discounting the data because I'm on the other side of the fence. I'm discounting it because it should by logical processes be discounted.

For example:

Let's say you were trying to figure out how many square miles the sky covers at a true altitude of 45,000 ft. (above sealevel.) And you are collecting data for this assumption.

Among the data you collect, you have the following information:

At 45,000 ft. the wavelength of the color of light of the sky for blank square miles is Blah Blah Blah.

Said data has no relevance to the discussion at hand. Sure it includes the variables we are looking at. The altitude, the sky, and area, But misses so many variables and relates them so differently that the data is essentially useless.

By similar concepts of fallacious arguments the data you gave falls under the category of irrelevant or at best unclear.

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

start deporting and making it harder for illegals to gain access to gov services and I bet alot start going home on their own:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wetback

"By the end of July, over 50,000 immigrants were caught in the two states. Around 488,000 illegal immigrants are claimed to have left voluntarily for fear of being apprehended. By September, 80,000 had been taken into custody in Texas, and the INS estimates that 500,000 to 700,000 had left Texas on their own."

but the democrats would lose votes, and the republicans would lose cheap labor. and since big business and political expedience run this country, they'll never shut off mexico.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

Again, You are good at completely ignoring all but what you wish to argue about. RIGHT BEFORE THAT... I CLEARLY SAID "ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION"

I NEVER RESPONDED TO THAT PART. THAT IS WHY IT WAS NOT IN BOLD.

Read the whole statement idiot. And this time don't pick and choose parts just to argue. you are wrong, moronic, and ignorant. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

You're just mad that i am a better wordsmith than you and that i am able to manipulate you into a tizzy so easily.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

OK I'm done arguing with you in this thread because you clearly realize you no longer have a leg to stand on in this matter and thus like so common on this forum you revert to that age old argument, "well that's not what I meant."
You are not fooling anybody, everyone knows what you meant in the OP and everyone sees that you are an idiot for the above post. Leave while you still can. Its only a matter of time before everyone sees your jargon for the crap it is. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

I SAID WHAT I MEANT.

 

HOW CONVENIENT FOR YOU TO CLAIM VICTORY AND RUN AWAY WHEN I CLEARLY PROVED YOU WRONG.

 

THATS THE TACTIC A FAT PERSON WOULD USE. YOU MUST BE FAT.

 

EVERYONE KNOWS FATTIES NEVER WIN AND WINNERS ARE NEVER FAT.

On a final note,
My statement was made without bias and without preconceived ideas and values. I am not discounting the data because I'm on the other side of the fence. I'm discounting it because it should by logical processes be discounted.

For example:

Let's say you were trying to figure out how many square miles the sky covers at a true altitude of 45,000 ft. (above sealevel.) And you are collecting data for this assumption.

Among the data you collect, you have the following information:

At 45,000 ft. the wavelength of the color of light of the sky for blank square miles is Blah Blah Blah.

Said data has no relevance to the discussion at hand. Sure it includes the variables we are looking at. The altitude, the sky, and area, But misses so many variables and relates them so differently that the data is essentially useless.

By similar concepts of fallacious arguments the data you gave falls under the category of irrelevant or at best unclear.

I THOUGHT YOU WERE DONE FATTY?

 

I MUST HAVE REALLY BEEN SUCCESSFUL TO MAKE YOU THIS MAD

 

[davidfre21 5,000+ posts]

I NEVER RESPONDED TO THAT PART. THAT IS WHY IT WAS NOT IN BOLD.


You're just mad that i am a better wordsmith than you and that i am able to manipulate you into a tizzy so easily.

this guy just likes to stir shit up and always manages to find someone to feed his need //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif