Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="cotjones" data-source="post: 6244433" data-attributes="member: 573988">On a final note,My statement was made without bias and without preconceived ideas and values. I am not discounting the data because I&#039;m on the other side of the fence. I&#039;m discounting it because it should by logical processes be discounted.For example:Let&#039;s say you were trying to figure out how many square miles the sky covers at a true altitude of 45,000 ft. (above sealevel.) And you are collecting data for this assumption.Among the data you collect, you have the following information:At 45,000 ft. the wavelength of the color of light of the sky for blank square miles is Blah Blah Blah.Said data has no relevance to the discussion at hand. Sure it includes the variables we are looking at. The altitude, the sky, and area, But misses so many variables and relates them so differently that the data is essentially useless.By similar concepts of fallacious arguments the data you gave falls under the category of irrelevant or at best unclear.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="cotjones, post: 6244433, member: 573988"] On a final note, My statement was made without bias and without preconceived ideas and values. I am not discounting the data because I'm on the other side of the fence. I'm discounting it because it should by logical processes be discounted. For example: Let's say you were trying to figure out how many square miles the sky covers at a true altitude of 45,000 ft. (above sealevel.) And you are collecting data for this assumption. Among the data you collect, you have the following information: At 45,000 ft. the wavelength of the color of light of the sky for blank square miles is Blah Blah Blah. Said data has no relevance to the discussion at hand. Sure it includes the variables we are looking at. The altitude, the sky, and area, But misses so many variables and relates them so differently that the data is essentially useless. By similar concepts of fallacious arguments the data you gave falls under the category of irrelevant or at best unclear. [/QUOTE]

Verification