why that was nice

[dragnix 5,000+ posts]

My favorite when I broke both my arms:

I can't tell which hole i should put it in in that picture

actually it was my younger cousin. she got prego and i had to punch her in the stomach a few times to set her straight.

you mean your guy cousin. It's ok, no need for the big man act here.

 

[power-fanatic07 5,000+ posts]

hahaha falcon punch.

that shit was classic

 

[HonkyKong 10+ year member]

I've been saving this exert from Wikipedia for the right occasion and I think that time is now.

The most explicit recorded incidents of public *** involving humans and animals activity are associated with the murderous sadism, torture and **** of the Roman games and circus, in which it is estimated that several hundreds of thousands died. Masters reports: "Beasts were specially trained to copulate with women: if the girls or women were unwilling then the animal would attempt ****. A surprising range of creatures was used for such purposes - bulls, giraffes, leopards, cheetahs, wild boar, zebras, stallions, jackasses, huge dogs, apes, etc. The beasts were taught how to copulate with a human being [whether male or female] either via the ****** or via the anus." Representations of scenes from the ****** lives of the gods, such as Pasiphaë and the Bull, were highly popular, often causing extreme suffering, injury or death. On occasion, the more ferocious beasts were permitted to kill and (if desired) devour their victims afterwards.
Chimpanzees and mandrills, both in fact ferocious and very powerful species of primate: "made drunk by wine and inflamed by the odor of females of their kind, were loosed upon girls whose genitals had been drenched with the urine of female chimps and mandrills." The victims were often virgins and not infrequently young children. One spectacle is said to have included "a hundred tiny blonde girls being ***** simultaneously by a horde of baboons."

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

I've been saving this exert from Wikipedia for the right occasion and I think that time is now.

you choose wisely.

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

Something this widespread and prevalent throughout the ages and across so many cultures most likely has some sort of natural, or evolutionary, basis.
there are many ways in which we cannot help behaving just as animals do — or mammals, anyway — and *** is one of the most obvious ones. We copulate, as they do. They have penises and *******, as we do, and the fact that the ****** of a calf can be sexually satisfying to a man shows how similar these organs are.

But the vehemence with which this prohibition continues to be held, its persistence while other non-reproductive ****** acts have become acceptable, suggests that there is another powerful force at work: our desire to differentiate ourselves, erotically and in every other way, from animals.

*** with animals does not always involve cruelty. Who has not been at a social occasion disrupted by the household dog gripping the legs of a visitor and vigorously rubbing its penis against them? The host usually discourages such activities, but in private not everyone objects to being used by her or his dog in this way, and occasionally mutually satisfying activities may develop.

However eating animals ALWAYS involves cruelty.

I as a human being, don't have said urges of animal desire. Others do, and as you pointed out have for a very long time. But just because this has been occurring for a long period of time, is it justifiable as a natural occurrence? Is it considered natural and acceptable only based on the fact that people were doing it before our time?

I for one can't see the consumption of animals as a cruel act. As this is natural. The circle of life if you will. Take a Lion for example, he eats to survive. If we start to label this as "Cruel" behavior, do we prevent the eating of animals? no.

People only use that argument to justify or validate their claim of ****** behavior with animals being acceptable...

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

I as a human being, don't have said urges of animal desire. Others do, and as you pointed out have for a very long time. But just because this has been occurring for a long period of time, is it justifiable as a natural occurrence? Is it considered natural and acceptable only based on the fact that people were doing it before our time?
I for one can't see the consumption of animals as a cruel act. As this is natural. The circle of life if you will. Take a Lion for example, he eats to survive. If we start to label this as "Cruel" behavior, do we prevent the eating of animals? no.

People only use that argument to justify or validate their claim of ****** behavior with animals being acceptable...

I never said it was acceptable, just that it probably has a natural basis.

****, infanticide, domestic violence all have evolutionary roots and the great apes still practice them today. We are great apes too. These things are not accepted, but they are natural.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

You do not have to eat meat to survive, just as you dont have to use animals to fulfill your ****** desire. It can be argued that both are cruel, but only one is accepted.

I argued that this is because to accept both puts human beings into the animal category.

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

hahhahahaha //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/popcorn.gif.32dd9e22fd77e77bc3c907062768fcd2.gif

 

[HonkyKong 10+ year member]

I as a human being, don't have said urges of animal desire. Others do, and as you pointed out have for a very long time. But just because this has been occurring for a long period of time, is it justifiable as a natural occurrence? Is it considered natural and acceptable only based on the fact that people were doing it before our time?
I for one can't see the consumption of animals as a cruel act. As this is natural. The circle of life if you will. Take a Lion for example, he eats to survive. If we start to label this as "Cruel" behavior, do we prevent the eating of animals? no.

People only use that argument to justify or validate their claim of ****** behavior with animals being acceptable...

Lions don't factory farm their food.

Personally I think there is anything wrong with people ****ing animals if that's their thing and they do it were no one sees it as long as their not forcing it on the animal, and before you say animals can't consent I would like you to show me proof that they can't, if an animal doesn't want to do something it won't, start messing around with a dog thats not interested and you'll probably get your *** bit. You seen the Mr. Hands video? That horse was clearly consenting.

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

Lions don't factory farm their food.

Hey now whether we farm them or hunt them, they are going in our stomachs...

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

Hey now whether we farm them or hunt them, they are going in our stomachs...

but the means to the end are qualitatively different.

You might argue that hunting a wild animal is not cruel because the animal lives free and then, hopefully, dies instantly.

However you cannot use this argument in regards to the meat you buy at the store and then consume.

Factory farmed meat lives a horrible life and then dies.

It's cruel.

Tasty, but cruel nonetheless.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

i remember when you could buy a 64oz of old E 800...

i don't remember, but I could lol at someone drinking a half-gallon of beer.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

this cruel farm life/death seems infinitely worse than having *** with an animal... even if the *** was non-consensual.. which doesnt seem to be the case a lot of times.

 

[audioarsonal 10+ year member]

Ahhhh the half gallon

of beer...Those were the days.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

i don't remember, but I could lol at someone drinking a half-gallon of beer.

At least for a brief period in the mid-1990s, some brands of malt liquor, including Olde English 800 and Mickey's, were available in even larger, 64-ounce glass bottles.