why that was nice

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

this same reasoning is also responsible for my endorsement of amputation requirements for anyone getting on permanent disability. The current system provides incentive for those not truly disabled to fake disability to receive a check.

Requiring anyone wishing to get on permanent disability to amputate their legs would ensure that only the truly disabled would be willing to accept the help.

My quest to ensure an adequate standard of living for those who are truly needy is quite compassionate to the deserving, and can only be called cold when applied to those who don't really need the help but are just lazy. I am unconcerend with the perception of coldness when applied to the lazy.

 

[staypuff 10+ year member]

this thread is now sounding like a Presidential advertisement..... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif

VOTE FOR FAULKTON IN '08

 

[mrogowski 5,000+ posts]

This is extremely serious. And I have my own personal reasons for saying that...

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

this thread is now sounding like a Presidential advertisement..... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif
VOTE FOR FAULKTON IN '08

I have far too many skeletons lurking in my past to hold a public position with the political system.

I see myself more as a speech writer.

 

[Beat_Dominator 5,000+ posts]

You are wrong. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

not uh

 

[Beat_Dominator 5,000+ posts]

yup //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

no wayz!

I have sighentific evidance.

 

[Beat_Dominator 5,000+ posts]

Look man, we computated your evidence and supplied your comments to a 50-subject double blind panel and the results said you were wrong.

Deal with it ok?

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

Look man, we computated your evidence and supplied your comments to a 50-subject double blind panel and the results said you were wrong.
Deal with it ok?

but you didnt randomly select my comments and observations and therefore your study wasnt random and your results aren't generalizable beyond your sample.

Plus you found a z score of zero.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

and you measured a nominal variable at the interval ratio level and lack even face validity let alone ecological or concurrent validity.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

i also question the reliability of your measure.

 

[Beat_Dominator 5,000+ posts]

You cannot refute the findings of this independent study. It was done with utmost care and without bias.

Like I said, you're just going to have to accept your failure at life.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

I have far too many skeletons lurking in my past to hold a public position with the political system.
I see myself more as a speech writer.

I take it you never started on your paper?

I answered 1/7 questions in an hour. I decided to take a break, boil some water, and drink some tea.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

I take it you never started on your paper?
I answered 1/7 questions in an hour. I decided to take a break, boil some water, and drink some tea.

No i am slowly working on my paper.

I did make some coffee and i am intermittently checking the forum.

I have about 3.5 pages thus far.

But it is crap.