why that was nice

[iceteebone 5,000+ posts]

*sigh* You don't belong in SD. Oh, and by the way, I'll be passing through Faulkton on Oct. 20th for.....you guessed it.....opening pheasant season. You see, my grandparents live up that way, and they own some land, which is currently in the CRP program (you do know what that is right, and how it affects wildlife?). I plan on enjoying the hunt very much. You see, hunting has its purposes, regardless of whether or not you're too narrow minded to realize them. Not all hunters are bad. Sure we use guns and arrows, but I don't recall any person that was able to catch a deer while running barefoot or jumping 100 feet into the air after a pheasant. I actually agree with those that say killing through feedlots is worse, as the animals have no chance at getting away. Lord knows I've thrown some steel out there that has missed its mark on more than one occasion. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif (Though not as many times as an out of state hunter. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eek.gif.771b7a90cf45cabdc554ff1121c21c4a.gif )
Its people that overlook game limits set by the GF&P, hunt on private property without permission, poach game not in season, or throw their kills out wastefully that need stopped. If you're going to kill it, kill it for the right reasons. Hunting is a sport, I can see how one might classify it as such, but abusing wildlife like that when one could be shooting sporting clays is just absurd.

Who does belong in South Dakota? That's about as bad as being in purgatory.

 

[Confusedsoul 10+ year member]

And what is the purpose?

Mainly population control. Pheasants are numerous here, as well as deer. Especially doe. Why let them get hit by cars? Better to keep their numbers at a respectable number and use the meat wisely than have them rot in a ditch.

 

[Confusedsoul 10+ year member]

Who does belong in South Dakota? That's about as bad as being in purgatory.

If you say so.

 

[iceteebone 5,000+ posts]

If you say so.

Yes I do say so. The only thing worse is North Dakota.

 

[iceteebone 5,000+ posts]

The humans need population control before the native animals do.

I agree.

First we can start by eliminating South Dakota.

 

[Confusedsoul 10+ year member]

I agree.
First we can start by eliminating South Dakota.

Oh yeah, cause that would eliminate a HUGE chunk of this countries population //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

 

[iceteebone 5,000+ posts]

Oh yeah, cause that would eliminate a HUGE chunk of this countries population //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

Small chunks my friend. Hitler didn't start by wiping out the Soviet Union first. He went after the crappy countries like Czechoslovakia and Poland.

 

[GMCJimmyslt2000 10+ year member]

why else were deer put on the earth...to fukin eat...not to get hit by cars!

 

[iceteebone 5,000+ posts]

South Dakota is fine with me. Can we nuke everything below it too?

Sure Nebraska and Kansas are useless.

 

[GMCJimmyslt2000 10+ year member]

**** i wish!!!