why that was nice

[Twistid 5,000+ posts]

i dont see why people are getting their panties in a bunch, if your on this website in the first place you

a) have a computer

b) have the internet

c) have invested in something as trivial as car audio

d) have time to actually waste responding to this thread

all of which do not fall under the umbrella of poverty

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

poverty is simply survival of the fittest applied to the civilized world
those who flourish are the fit, and therefore should be allowed to procreate

while those who fail and are below average income are obviously the weaker of the two and should be subject to the theory of eugenics

the problem with you thesis is the causal direction. They become weak because they are poor.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

I'm pretty sure this thread is going to fail. The initial argument is far too complex for anyone to respond to it. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

I can but you know, I am more of a snake in the grass.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

i dont see why people are getting their panties in a bunch, if your on this website in the first place you a) have a computer

b) have the internet

c) have invested in something as trivial as car audio

d) have time to actually waste responding to this thread

all of which do not fall under the umbrella of poverty

All of which can be accessed via public assistance.

 

[jimmclrk1 10+ year member]

Flipx99>Faulkton.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

Flipx99>Faulkton.

more like

josh>josh>jimmclrk

 

[Twistid 5,000+ posts]

the problem with you thesis is the causal direction. They become weak because they are poor.

no they are poor because they are weak

its like the aristocracy of the olden days... those born of wealth were obviously begat from successfull parents and therefore given more opportunities to flourish and succeed, while those begat from unsuccessfull parents were forced to till the land in a meager hope of having a turnip for dinner

obviously if the latter were successfull in any way they wouldve have changed their situation , stacked some turnips, and pay off the local irish mafia to off the king and steal his throne

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

Flipx99>Faulkton.

Depends...

I have much respect for faulkton in his ability to draw a crowd. I have the ability to dismantle it.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

Depends...
I have much respect for faulkton in his ability to draw a crowd. I have the ability to dismantle it.

i have social theory and you have economics.

 

[Mugen 10+ year member]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif I

It always makes me giggle to see people look at blatant sarcasm, and obvious mockery and assume it's dead serious. Honestly, you'd think people would learn right now that these threads are all good fun. But after posting this in every single Faulkton thread, people just trudge on through it...

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

no they are poor because they are weak
its like the aristocracy of the olden days... those born of wealth were obviously begat from successfull parents and therefore given more opportunities to flourish and succeed, while those begat from unsuccessfull parents were forced to till the land in a meager hope of having a turnip for dinner

obviously if the latter were successfull in any way they wouldve have changed their situation , stacked some turnips, and pay off the local irish mafia to off the king and steal his throne

yet empirical studies say otherwise.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

I could even use the Bible of all things to destory Twisted's post. I would rather just sit and wait.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

lmao at the evolving title.

NWS:

http://www.funny-pictures.com/albums/amazing/small_penis.jpg

 

[jimmclrk1 10+ year member]

I could even use the Bible of all things to destory Twisted's post. I would rather just sit and wait.

The Bible is a work of fiction.

 

[Twistid 5,000+ posts]

yet empirical studies say otherwise.

how so?

show me where the poor become weak because of their situation, in what social experiments this has been observed...

ive already supported my theory with the empirically based aristocracy of the middle ages

which obviously is that the ruling aristocracy being wealthy and successfull stayed in power while the peons being impoverished stayed that way because of their inablility to succeed