why that was nice

Should i start using crystal meth?

  • Sure...its not that bad...

    Votes: 93 62.0%
  • Just say no!

    Votes: 57 38.0%

  • Total voters
    150
There Are No Shortcuts is a window into the urban public school system as experienced by accomplished teacher Rafe Esquith. This semiautobiographical work uses short vignettes, words of wisdom, and inspirational tales to paint a picture of the barriers and triumphs experienced by Mr. Esquith and the students in his classroom. Throughout the work Mr. Esquith shares some of the strategies and techniques he has employed in persuading his students of the importance of achieving excellence. He details his failures and his successes. The book is not a guide for teachers, or a master plan for fixing the problems facing public education. Beyond filling the profession with people as devoted as Mr. Esquith, no workable macro level solutions are offered. What is offered is the telling of one mans almost religious devotion to providing a quality educational experience for his students. His often humorous tales provide a rough outline detailing his teaching philosophy and how he has implemented it in his classroom throughout his years as a teacher. Written in no nonsense and simple style, the book is easy to read and does contain some value for educators, students, and parents; yet it is also useful for the aggrandizement and ego stroking of the author.

The Rafe Esquith we are introduced to in the opening chapters is an idealistic man who lives by his principles. He has an almost spiritual devotion to being a good teacher. In a world where mediocrity is not only acceptable, but encouraged, he demands excellence from not only his students but from himself. He is not a man to back down and comply in order to get along, but he is smart enough to recognize when he is defeated and accept a loss in order to fight another day. Early on we learn that taking the path less traveled will come with a price, and Mr. Esquith is more than ready to pay. In fact Mr. Esquith’s teaching career was almost ended before it had even begun; his first experience with adversity comes while he was still in graduate school, when his moral ability to teach is questioned. Details aren’t important; it’s just one of many examples sketching the character and determination of Mr. Esquith in a positive light.

Starting his teaching career in a comfortable upper-middle school system he quickly becomes disenchanted with his setting. He is bothered that these fortunate children don’t need him. His social-conscious is conflicted by his situation and he makes the choice to move to an intercity school populated by a much more diverse student body. The overall impression the author gives of himself approaches sainthood, yet the portrait presented during his first few years of teaching is filled with naivety and unfocused determination. He knows what he wants to be, a first class educator providing opportunity to disadvantaged children, but he first must learn how to survive

After we have been properly assured of the moral intentions and fortitude of the author, we are given his views on the importance of reading. An entire chapter is devoted to the obstacles barring successful reading programs and how he surmounted those obstacles. He outlines macro level barriers such as compulsory reading programs from the district, and teachers who don’t enjoy reading themselves. He details his micro level problems, like where to obtain enough books to use for his own reading program. While he offers his responses to the micro level problems he encounters, he fails to provide any real macro level solutions other than to let educators choose what they teach with and for them to be better educators. While it might be nice if the determination and enthusiasm characterizing Mr. Esquith was the standard in the teaching profession, sadly this is not the case. Providing a model that will never be actualized by the vast majority in the field is of little value except for stroking the ego of the author.

Numbers are also given special attention in the book. Beyond the obligatory slamming of coworkers and the bureaucracy, Mr. Esquith provides an interesting approach to teaching math and economics. What he describes is not a traditional math program, but instead an applied exercise in math and economics. It is an engrossing multifaceted experience that not only allows pupils to develop math skills, but also is enlightening on certain aspects of the real world not often seen in fifth grade classrooms.

Every student has a job, is paid a wage, and has the opportunity to squander or save their money. They can rent their desks, month to month, or they can save their money and purchase their seat for the entire year. There are opportunities to earn bonus money, and fines for disobeying the rules. The pay structure is set so that success only comes with effort beyond mediocrity. A comfortable existence in Mr. Esquith’s classroom, much like in real life, only comes with hard work. The jobs that the students fill teach them responsibility as well as freeing up time for Mr. Esquith. The entire system is set up to teach the children the value of owning property, saving money, and some of the keys to realizing success in our society. Slipping past with minimal effort doesn’t actualize success in our society, especially when the starting point is disadvantaged. Mr. Esquith has realized this and has developed this ingenious program to try and instill this lesson in his students.

Beyond his discourse on reading and math, we are given principles that outline Mr. Esquith’s teaching philosophy along side tales reinforcing his image as a superior teacher and human being. He won’t back down, although he will and often does compromise. Compromise is a necessary evil if he wishes to continue toward his ultimate goal. He certainly isn’t foolish enough to pursue one battle to the point conceding the war. Mr. Esquith sets high standards, and when they are achieved he sets them even higher. Slight improvements and mediocrity aren’t good enough for Mr. Esquith. He sees the big picture facing these kids, a world where opportunities are not equal and the only way to overcome the seemingly endless cycles of poverty and destitution is through education and hard work. Good enough isn’t what leads to a comfortable life, and he works hard to make sure that his students understand this. He stresses the importance of learning English in his classroom, while trying to recognize the value in knowing ones traditional roots. Religion is something that he keeps out of his classroom, as he has realized how easy it can be to alienate students with differing beliefs. He recognizes the political agendas pushed by the system, but operates by his own political agenda. He doesn’t allow external political pressure to obfuscate what is important to him, the quality of education he offers his students. Time is to be used, not wasted. He dodges what he views as bureaucratic wastes of time at every opportunity, even at financial cost to himself. He would rather spend time in class with students than in training seminars required by the district. He believes in travel with students who have demonstrated they know how to behave in public settings and he takes many trips with his students. These are just some of the principles that make up the teaching philosophy outlined by the author.

 
Mr. Esquith, in all his glory, still makes mistakes. However, his are admirable mistakes, the best kind to make. He works too hard and he cares too much. He sacrifices his health for his students. He goes into debt buying educational supplies and taking children on long and expensive trips. He even works second and third jobs to bring in more money. He becomes careless and by some accounts endangers children in the process. He has a tough time learning his personal limits mentally, physically and financially. Pushing himself too hard culminates when he is hospitalized and is forced to leave a group of children alone on a camping trip. After being stabilized in the emergency room, he sneaks out of the hospital and returns to the kids in the woods. With this experience comes the realization that he cannot push himself to the point of compromising his ultimate goal. Mr. Esquith realizes that not recognizing the limits of human possibility is detrimental to his ultimate purpose, and that it is to the benefit of his students if he sets realistic limits for himself.

Mr. Esquith is also guilty of being too judgmental of the perceived mistakes his students are making. This lesson comes at a painful price personally. But ultimately he learns that he can only provide opportunities he believes will be beneficial to his pupils. If they choose another path, even if he thinks they are in err, he must respect their choices and continue to be supportive of them should they choose to seek his counsel at some later time. Each life is a personal journey and to fully realize his intended outcome he sometimes must just sit back and allow people to choose their own path.

Throughout the book Mr. Esquith compares his outlook with literary characters. He takes on differing literary personas at differing stages in his career. Early on he compares himself to Roy Hobbs in The Natural. Roy wants to be recognized as the best ball player in the world when he walks down the street. Early in his career Mr. Esquith claims to be motivated in the same way. He says that his strive for excellence and determination is fed ultimately by recognition. Even when he disavows the Roy Hobbs paradigm in favor of Huck Finn, there is truth to be found in his earliest comparison.

The Huck Finn paradigm represents the middle portion of his career. He feels betrayed by an unjust system and society; he commits to flipping-the-bird at the entire system and rejects the whole **** thing with adversarial delight. He will set out in uncharted territory and live by his principles; if anyone wants to join him they are welcome. Rafe realizes the brashness of this approach when he hurts the feelings of an innocent student. The connection between the events described and his paradigm shift isn’t made explicitly clear, but from this incident he evolves from a Huck Finn outlook to one modeled after Atticus Finch in To Kill a Mocking Bird.

Atticus knows he is fighting a losing battle, but that is irrelevant. He must go into the courtroom and fight the battle the best that he can. He must be true to himself and continues fighting what he knows is a losing battle for no other reason than to be true to the ideals and principles that he lives by. It doesn’t matter if the odds are against him and it does no good to get angry and reject everything. Those are self defeating attitudes that are detrimental to his stated purpose. The Atticus Finch paradigm is instrumental in dealing with conflict from this point on. No longer will he be so easily infuriated with limitations and restriction placed in his way by the bureaucracy and society. If he wants to instill humanity, manners, and respect in his children he must do it by example, as distasteful as that might be at times.

Mr. Esquith provides no shortage of the problems facing some of our schools. The book is filled with the many obstacles and challenges that he has faced through his years in the classroom. From unwavering bureaucrats and bureaucratic policies, the incompetent teachers that they hire, and the competent ones they chase away, there is no shortage of the evils lurking within the educational system. The text is peppered with depressing tales of artificial barriers created in the educational process. Special attention is given to the negative contributions that the union makes. While he proclaims a need for union representation, he is critical of the effects that this has on the teaching system. Much like with compromise, Mr. Esquith sees unions as a necessary evil.

We are presented with a seemingly endless supply of villains and barriers. Heroes and successes, beyond Mr. Esquith, are much harder to find. Almost instantly we come to realize that the author is a remarkable man and deserves much respect for his determination and hard work. Mr. Esquith has indeed won many teaching honors and awards, and the great feats he has personally accomplished should not be diminished. But what is there to offer us in the way of applicable macro level solutions? Beyond his exercise in economics, we find little. Looking further at his economic program, if it was systemized and developed into an educational seminar for staff development, it would become the exact thing that Mr. Esquith would encourage educators to skip. There seems to be little except to raise everyone to his standards; while quite admirable, this doesn’t seem to be a realistic solution to the multitude of problems presented by Mr. Esquith.

So what we are left is the memoir of a legend, written emphasizing his great deeds and accomplishments. Enjoyable and humorous as it might be, what is offered to us is not a solution as much as it is a Christ like model. While devotion and good intentions are nice things to emulate, how many of us are ready to follow the example at the same expense? If correcting the problems outlined by Mr. Esquith is dependant upon populating the teaching profession with people as devoted, self-sacrificing, and as strong as Mr. Esquith himself, we are indeed in trouble.

Pointing to the extreme gap that exist between the model provided and what is offered in reality, does not discount the importance of having admirable role models. Indeed we need great figures to set examples. It is clear that Mr. Esquith is indeed a great example to follow, and the teaching profession would clearly benefit from more people as admirable and dedicated as Mr. Esquith. Nonetheless, when bombarded with tale after tale of the great accomplishments and sacrifices made by the accomplisher himself, one is left with a feeling of smug arrogance and superiority. Perhaps Mr. Esquith’s disavowal of Roy Hobbs wasn’t entirely genuine.

 
Well 130K is a HUGE metropolis in a place where the state capital has 14K //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
thats like down east canada where i grew up. our capital is halifax, and has between 100,000, and 200,000 people. where i live now, the closest town has 100,000 people, and then about 15 minutes south there is another "town" it has 140,000 people. and then another 20 mminutes south is toronto which has a couple million. needless to say its quite a different life than i am used to.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

faulkton

5,000+ posts
CarAudio.com Veteran
Thread starter
faulkton
Joined
Location
neverland
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
31,921
Views
600,990
Last reply date
Last reply from
natisfynest
IMG_20260513_214311575.jpg

ThxOne

    May 13, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260513_213956814.jpg

ThxOne

    May 13, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top