why that was nice

[vasilios 10+ year member]

i won't disagree, but i'd like to see that study. most exteme pro-life activists are women.

Every site that is pro-choice has been organized by females, at leat that Ive been to, and Ive been to quite a lot.

Im just making an observation. Ive come across very few pro-choice males. However, I have yet to come across a pro-life female, including my own family members, immediate or distant, class mates and co-workers throughout the years.

I guess it was luck of the draw, but so many more males, to me, seem to be much more pro-life.

 

[sundownz Pro Seller]

What is more worse for a child? Killing it before it is alive.... or letting it live through 18 years of hell ( most people getting abortions wouldn't be good parents anyways and probally aren't financially comfortable).
Also what about the girls that are birth control, and you use a condom and they still get pregnant? They took every precaution there. And don't say it happens cuz I know TWO girls it has happened to.

Not that your questions aren't valid... but, shouldn't that baby have a chance at life to determine for their self if they want to be alive? There is also adoption if they can't be taken care of.

Both situations are based on emotional questions... not if it is right or wrong to take the life of the developing baby -- that should be the REAL question. Yes, life sucks, but that doesn't making killing right, does it?

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

What is more worse for a child? Killing it before it is alive.... or letting it live through 18 years of hell ( most people getting abortions wouldn't be good parents anyways and probally aren't financially comfortable).
Also what about the girls that are birth control, and you use a condom and they still get pregnant? They took every precaution there. And don't say it happens cuz I know TWO girls it has happened to.

you knowing 2 girls that used birth control and a condom and still getting pregnant is rarer than winning the lotto. i've been bangin' my girl daily for 5 years with just birth control and no condom and she is baby free.

 

[the727kid 10+ year member]

you knowing 2 girls that used birth control and a condom and still getting pregnant is rarer than winning the lotto. i've been bangin' my girl daily for 5 years with just birth control and no condom and she is baby free.

FL high school girls are huge ****s lol.

 

[vasilios 10+ year member]

Once again, case in point; this forum is 99% pro-life and so happens to be 99% male.

So far anyway.

 

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

Every site that is pro-choice has been organized by females, at leat that Ive been to, and Ive been to quite a lot.
Im just making an observation. Ive come across very few pro-choice males. However, I have yet to come across a pro-life female, including my own family members, immediate or distant, class mates and co-workers throughout the years.

I guess it was luck of the draw, but so many more males, to me, seem to be much more pro-life.

You kidding?

It's not MY choice... it's there's.

I don't care either way, I just give them in back alleys... for free...

nG

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

FL high school girls are huge ****s lol.

it's possible that they are also liars.

 

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

Not that your questions aren't valid... but, shouldn't that baby have a chance at life to determine for their self if they want to be alive? There is also adoption if they can't be taken care of.
Both situations are based on emotional questions... not if it is right or wrong to take the life of the developing baby -- that should be the REAL question. Yes, life sucks, but that doesn't making killing right, does it?

They don't have a brain yet. LAwl.

nG

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

Once again, case in point; this forum is 99% pro-life and so happens to be 99% male.

this forum is nowhere near 99% pro-life. put up a poll and find out.

 

[the727kid 10+ year member]

Not that your questions aren't valid... but, shouldn't that baby have a chance at life to determine for their self if they want to be alive? There is also adoption if they can't be taken care of.
Both situations are based on emotional questions... not if it is right or wrong to take the life of the developing baby -- that should be the REAL question. Yes, life sucks, but that doesn't making killing right, does it?

That's a good point... but sometimes people would rather die than live life like that...(*******). If you put a kid up for adoption he/she could spend 18 years of worse hell, going to a family that is poor with 18 kids and just adopts kids for more welfare, or spend whole life in an orphange.

The choice should be left to the parents.

 

[the727kid 10+ year member]

it's possible that they are also liars.

I'm not sure about one, but I know for a fact the other one isn't.

 

[vasilios 10+ year member]

this forum is nowhere near 99% pro-life. put up a poll and find out.

It is turning out to be the majority though. That is my point.

And it is not surprising.

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

It is turning out to be the majority though. That is my point.
And it is not surprising.

i think the majority of people, men or women, are pro-life or don't care either way. put up a poll that gives the 3 options and see how it comes out.

 

[sundownz Pro Seller]

They don't have a brain yet. LAwl.
nG

Thats the key word Noah, yet. They will, if they aren't killed before being born.

Infants don't have a concept of object permanence, they don't understand if an object is hidden that it's still there... can we kill them too? It was okay to kill them just a few months ago, right?

You are suffering from the same flaw in perception of time as I mentioned before -- that child WILL have a brain, and would be born, or at least have a chance at being born IF the procedure was not performed. The only difference is the position in time... which is just another dimension like space, only our perception varies. If you apply this universally you can say it's okay to kill people south of the equator but not north of it... as they are separated by a certain measure in a certain dimension. NO different in objective reality than a separation in time, other than how we perceive and experience it. And yes, I consider this point very important for understanding REALITY as it IS and not how someone FEELS that it is.

 

[sundownz Pro Seller]

That's a good point... but sometimes people would rather die than live life like that...(*******). If you put a kid up for adoption he/she could spend 18 years of worse hell, going to a family that is poor with 18 kids and just adopts kids for more welfare, or spend whole life in an orphange.
The choice should be left to the parents.

He COULD, yes, maybe... but some people are happy in life regardless of how they grew up, people come out of it. Read my above point to Noah -- and really think about deeply. If you think that it is okay to kill a child before it is born, why not after? The only difference is a separation in time.