why that was nice

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

he sounds stupid. He could have probably made more on unemployment than he will working at Wendys. You're smarter than he is i just know it.

His industry doesn't follow those same rules. Basically he was a contractor employed by himself...if that makes any sense. He said he couldn't get much because he didn't pay much or some shit. He works another job as well.

the government. Otherwise it'll be overthrown.

There is no government as an aside entitiy. The government is the people. This, the people are responsible for their own satisfaction.

You're on thin ice flip. Especially if you think a government can survive a situation where the masses are treated like the people in Auschwitz.

A government that attempts to cater to the inherently inflationary satisfaction of the masses has an equal chance of surviving. The underlying assumption behind Smith's words are that people are rational. The guy you quoted the other day implied you think people are not rational. Thus, catering to the needs of the irrational majority is not a perpetual process. I was being facetious the Holocaust and you know this.

retribution for all those "no coloreds" signs whites use to put up pre 1970. i still wonder what those white's only pies must have tasted like.

I dunno. I am always preterbed by the dual water fountains. It would seem like activist shareholders would be like, " WHY IN THE FVCK ARE YOU BUILDING 2 WATER FOUNTAINS. WHAT A WASTE OF MONEY" But no. I couldn't imagine racism so deep that I'd piss away money.

 

[snb778 5,000+ posts]

cliffs

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

His industry doesn't follow those same rules. Basically he was a contractor employed by himself...if that makes any sense. He said he couldn't get much because he didn't pay much or some shit. He works another job as well.

your anecdotal evidence isn't convincing.

There is no government as an aside entitiy. The government is the people. This, the people are responsible for their own satisfaction.

People acting collectively to protect all of their interests.

A government that attempts to cater to the inherently inflationary satisfaction of the masses has an equal chance of surviving. The underlying assumption behind Smith's words are that people are rational. The guy you quoted the other day implied you think people are not rational. Thus, catering to the needs of the irrational majority is not a perpetual process. I was being facetious the Holocaust and you know this.

I post a lot of things that are contradictory. It'd be a mistake to believe you can discern my beliefs from postings.

the point at which the inflationary nature of satisfaction becomes an issue is far above the bar for revolution and the collapse of a government.

 

[tapout 5,000+ posts]

repost. lol

http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showthread.php?t=227439

 

[tapout 5,000+ posts]

ohi

 

[duece212 5,000+ posts]

deja vous?

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

the point at which the inflationary nature of satisfaction becomes an issue is far above the bar for revolution and the collapse of a government.

I have no qualms this this. I don't see how it answered my question at all.

The sky is blue on sunny days... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

lol flip already pointed it out and it still didnt die.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

lol flip already pointed it out and it still didnt die.

Me and you carried it...which is why.

2007 was a good trolling year.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

I have no qualms this this. I don't see how it answered my question at all.
The sky is blue on sunny days... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

i didnt see any question, just a statement.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

I am surprised how my answer was strikingly similar 2 years ago.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

Furthermore, satisfaction tends to rise with satisfaction. After a year of eating the minimal food for survival, one may want to eat every day. How do we deal, in your opinion, with ever increasing wants? Currently, we limit this with price, but according to you it is society's obligation to continue to cater to ever-increasing wants (in order for the masses to be satisified). Furthermore, when does a trifling inconvience become a major inconvience? How is that point measured and who determines it?

i didnt see any question, just a statement.

This one.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

lol i didnt even read it.. was looking for another thread and found it.. knew people would fall for it again.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

lol i didnt even read it.. was looking for another thread and found it.. knew people would fall for it again.

Going back and forth with you is getting old. Not in a bad way, but we both have a pretty good understanding of where the other one stands. I think we need to lower the bar a bit to keep everyone interested.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

This one.

that's not what you quoted.

I think i indirectly answered it.

One measure could be when people begin to revolt.