why that was nice

Should i start using crystal meth?

  • Sure...its not that bad...

    Votes: 93 62.0%
  • Just say no!

    Votes: 57 38.0%

  • Total voters
    150
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif i pwned everyone //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif
 
I never attributed it to evolution alone. Obviously it isnt the only factor or we would ALL exhibit the behavior.
Nonetheless... to ignore a natural or evolutionary role in searching for a cause is as foolish as attributing it solely to evolution.
Foolish?

If a blind man is lost in the woods is it more foolish for him to sit down or try to find his way out?

Granted this is theoretical science. But careful not to attribute any more to the claim than due.

This example of **** in no way supports evolution in a manner more than circumstantial. Thus It is not justified to say "hey monkeys ****, we must come from monkeys."

But it is justified to say, *** gives humans and monkeys pleasure thus they both strive to receive it and may occasionally take it by force if they have the ability. Emotional repercussions are what prevent humans from raping. If these repercussions are diminished in the mind of the aggressor compared to ****** impulse, **** will happen. Animals to our knowledge do not follow this system of emotional repercussion. If the female does not have the power to stop the male *** happens, it's not fair to even call it ****.

Is anyone really going to try to tell me they like masturbating more than ***?

 
Foolish?
If a blind man is lost in the woods is it more foolish for him to sit down or try to find his way out?
who cares and what does this have to do with anything.

Granted this is theoretical science. But careful not to attribute any more to the claim than due.
I didnt.

This example of **** in no way supports evolution in a manner more than circumstantial. Thus It is not justified to say "hey monkeys ****, we must come from monkeys."
I never said this.

If you believe this to be the case you should probably just quit.

But it is justified to say, *** gives humans and monkeys pleasure thus they both strive to receive it and may occasionally take it by force if they have the ability. Emotional repercussions are what prevent humans from raping. If these repercussions are diminished in the mind of the aggressor compared to ****** impulse, **** will happen. Animals to our knowledge do not follow this system of emotional repercussion. If the female does not have the power to stop the male *** happens, it's not fair to even call it ****.
This statement is so convoluted i'm only going to say **** = copulation where the victim resists to the best of her ability, or where the likely result of such resistance would be death or bodily harm.

Whatever you are trying to convey about "emotional repercussions" is a fail.

 
more like WINCEST
1245892040940.jpg


 
you could attribute it to repercussions.. but to limit it to emotional repercussions is like limiting the phenomenon to a sole cultural cause.. ignoring the contribution of evolution... foolish..

Using your same logic we can say animals do it for the repercussions.. namely the offspring... or they do it to avoid the repercussion ... namely not having any offspring.

either way you put it you're wrong.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

faulkton

5,000+ posts
CarAudio.com Veteran
Thread starter
faulkton
Joined
Location
neverland
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
31,921
Views
598,853
Last reply date
Last reply from
natisfynest
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top