qtipextra
5,000+ posts
The Original
By better, I mean, which is all around better for SPL. (Louder, but in an SQ install).
Given that each sub would be powered with their RMS rating, in a 2 cube ported box tuned to 30hz.
I dont want to give brand names of subs, because that might caused biased results.
I know what most of these specs are, but I dont now on which specs if higher or lower is better.
So along with which you say is better, please tell me WHY!
SUB 1:
Fs : 45.24 Hz
Qms : 4.74
Qts : 0.850
Qes : 1.03
Mms : 204.14 g
Vas : 0.822 ft³ (23.28 liters)
Xmax : 0.650 in (16.51 mm)
Sd : 81.03 in² (522.79 cm ²)
Prms : 400 Watts
Spl (1w/1m): 85.25 dB
Displacement: .09 ft (Cubed)
Sub 2:
Fs: 25.1
Qms: 4.5
Qts: .44
Qes: .49
Mms: 171g
Vas: 72.9
Xmax: 18mm
Sd: 480
Prms: 600 Watts
Spl (1w/1m): 86.1
Displacement: .15 ft(cubed)
Given that each sub would be powered with their RMS rating, in a 2 cube ported box tuned to 30hz.
I dont want to give brand names of subs, because that might caused biased results.
I know what most of these specs are, but I dont now on which specs if higher or lower is better.
So along with which you say is better, please tell me WHY!
SUB 1:
Fs : 45.24 Hz
Qms : 4.74
Qts : 0.850
Qes : 1.03
Mms : 204.14 g
Vas : 0.822 ft³ (23.28 liters)
Xmax : 0.650 in (16.51 mm)
Sd : 81.03 in² (522.79 cm ²)
Prms : 400 Watts
Spl (1w/1m): 85.25 dB
Displacement: .09 ft (Cubed)
Sub 2:
Fs: 25.1
Qms: 4.5
Qts: .44
Qes: .49
Mms: 171g
Vas: 72.9
Xmax: 18mm
Sd: 480
Prms: 600 Watts
Spl (1w/1m): 86.1
Displacement: .15 ft(cubed)
