Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="qtipextra" data-source="post: 1434715" data-attributes="member: 555270">By better, I mean, which is all around better for SPL. (Louder, but in an SQ install).Given that each sub would be powered with their RMS rating, in a 2 cube ported box tuned to 30hz.I dont want to give brand names of subs, because that might caused biased results.I know what most of these specs are, but I dont now on which specs if higher or lower is better.So along with which you say is better, please tell me WHY!SUB 1:Fs : 45.24 HzQms : 4.74Qts : 0.850Qes : 1.03Mms : 204.14 gVas : 0.822 ft³ (23.28 liters)Xmax : 0.650 in (16.51 mm)Sd : 81.03 in² (522.79 cm ²)Prms : 400 WattsSpl (1w/1m): 85.25 dBDisplacement: .09 ft (Cubed)Sub 2:Fs: 25.1Qms: 4.5Qts: .44Qes: .49Mms: 171gVas: 72.9Xmax: 18mmSd: 480Prms: 600 WattsSpl (1w/1m): 86.1Displacement: .15 ft(cubed)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="qtipextra, post: 1434715, member: 555270"] By better, I mean, which is all around better for SPL. (Louder, but in an SQ install). Given that each sub would be powered with their RMS rating, in a 2 cube ported box tuned to 30hz. I dont want to give brand names of subs, because that might caused biased results. I know what most of these specs are, but I dont now on which specs if higher or lower is better. So along with which you say is better, please tell me WHY! SUB 1: Fs : 45.24 Hz Qms : 4.74 Qts : 0.850 Qes : 1.03 Mms : 204.14 g Vas : 0.822 ft³ (23.28 liters) Xmax : 0.650 in (16.51 mm) Sd : 81.03 in² (522.79 cm ²) Prms : 400 Watts Spl (1w/1m): 85.25 dB Displacement: .09 ft (Cubed) Sub 2: Fs: 25.1 Qms: 4.5 Qts: .44 Qes: .49 Mms: 171g Vas: 72.9 Xmax: 18mm Sd: 480 Prms: 600 Watts Spl (1w/1m): 86.1 Displacement: .15 ft(cubed) [/QUOTE]

Verification