Which design?

[Lschevelle 10+ year member]

im not that good with google sketchup, but i was wondering which design would be better for a trunk setup porting through the rear deck?

33d 17h 35w

with three 6" aero ports

two sundown z 15's

saz-3500d

Click to read more...

 

[pro-rabbit 5,000+ posts]

those are just "blowing" through the rear deck. Porting through the rear deck is the port going through the rear deck venting into the cabin.

 

[Lschevelle 10+ year member]

so is blowing through the rear deck efficient or not? so if i put the ports through the deck down through the box how can i attach them to the box

 

[pro-rabbit 5,000+ posts]

What kind of car? If your seats fold down then firing forward and sealing off is a much better option.

 

[Lschevelle 10+ year member]

04 impala and no the seats don't fold down

 

[RAM_Designs 5,000+ posts]

What kind of car? If your seats fold down then firing forward and sealing off is a much better option.

Agreed, but it seems like he'd have some sort of reason for having to fir through the rear deck(never a fun thing to do).

 

[Lschevelle 10+ year member]

i have a max width of 35 so i will not be able to have the subs and ports fire in the same direction

 

[pro-rabbit 5,000+ posts]

I would do option one. sorry I have been hella busy as always it seems. I think that would also cut down on the "holy crap my trunk lid is breaking" affect. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 

[Lschevelle 10+ year member]

So will option 1 work better than sub up port back?