What REALLY doesn't help is letting mclerico spam the forum with product he pushes and then lie about how efficient it is etc. Misinformation is rampant on this forum. Heaven forbid someone try to correct it.
This kind of shit doesn't help anybody least of all OP.
thats cadence you ****ing moron direct from them howell nj, best audio deals, see what they are selling all cadence items, when you pm them roy starling of cadence will respond
You're such an idiot. Nobody cares who it is. There is no 95% efficient amplifier out there. If you truly believe it is, you're even dumber than you sound. Don't you think if there were, EVERYONE would use it? Why would we use anything else?
everyone did use it back in 2002 moron its the ultimate competition amp ****ing put 6 cadence a7hc's in a ar and be in the same class as a sundow 3000 but putting out 3 times as much power its a cheater amp and yes its possible im sorry you fail, im sorry its not forum boner on here, lmfao obviously you just proved you know nothing
and if you would of read effeciency is its 4 ohm rating but at 1 ohm its much more effecient then most amps out their thats what i have been trying to tell u
ehhhh fail
Relevance? You're providing a fictitious efficiency rating that is not even applicable to the impedence in question and then telling me I'm stupid. You're clearly delusional. Nobody likes you. gtfo.
oh i prooved at 1 ohm most effeciency is around 60 to 75 percent posted many articles and other amps so ur prized sundown using your calculations puts out 600 to 750 rms, it dosent work like that, thats all i was prooving be quite, you have contributed nothing to this forum but bs opinions based with no fact so get out, you fail
MY prized sundown? When did I ever state that? YOU did you idiot. Also you're comparing an efficiency to rms. Why not compare efficiency to efficiency? See you have no clue what you're talking about. You haven't proven anything. You liked to an ebay auction to try to prove some specs. It's hilarious that you still think you have any sort of point or credibility.
fail ur formula dosent work proove it right 75 fuse rating times 14.4 equals what ecrack, then times .84 effeciency what do u get. fail
My formula? Show where I used a formula and it was wrong you idiot. Do you remember when I said that fuses can take more power than they are rated for? They just can't take the 30% more like you were claiming indefinitely. You're STILL wrong you're just too stupid to know it.
