You ever listen to someone explaining something when you know they are wrong and you feel embarrassed for them? Well that is how I feel for you guys. If someone tells you something, listen, digest and then do your own research. Read some books, do your own investigation into the truth.
As for helotaxi, I feel sorry for him. First he says that the similarity between crystals ends once they become crystals? Then he mentions congruence. Well, when something, any thing and everything transforms from a liquid to a solid it crystallizes. Crystallizations is just that, from a liquid to a solid. Everything that turns from a liquid to a solid is similar in the fact that it forms a crystalline structure. Congruence has absolutely nothing to do with crystallization as no crystal is the same (they are non-congruent).
With that, everything that turns from a liquid to a solid will form crystals of different sizes depends on the rate they are cooled. This is why I mention testing the theory with water. And as I will try to explain below (and is not even mentioned in the posted link) the crystalline structure will change the electro-mechanical properties (as explained in the linked post… to a point. But there is a lot more to it).
BTW, when you bend a wire you do not deform the crystal structure. When you cut a wire or heat it to austenite you do, of course. And there is a difference in the electrical flow properties of a metal composition that is ductile and one that is brittle. Don’t just agree or disagree, do the research your self or even test the theory.
Now the forum post linked earlier is a good read. However, it only states the mechanical properties of wire. He makes no mention at all of the chemical or molecular structure of metal and the difference it makes on the mechanics of the electrical flow properties. I would assume he probably knows there is a lot more involved, but his agenda is to disprove not actually teach. I would have loved to post to the thread but I am sure, as is here, I would just be wasting my time with someone that has only done a little research or simply read something on the internet.
Me, I like to learn. When I want to know what makes electricity flow, I read, a lot. When I want to know why my computer runs faster when it is cool, or how the properties of the molecules change the electrical flow under different stresses (ie: hot or cold), I read, a lot.
So, you guys can call me an idiot all you want. You can agree with helotaxi all you want (even though I proved him wrong). Or you can digest what we all say and investigate yourself. And unless you yourselves have done research into how electricity flows through metal, down to a molecular level, I would stay out of the conversations.
Now, if someone tells you that the sky is blue because of the sun or that grass is green because of chlorophyll, do you want to just repeat what you hear or do research as to how it actually happens. Me I like to learn.