Underhung TC Nomz

So based on this, underhung/overhung has nothing to do with the actual motor, but only the coil? I hear people all the time saying underhung motor. Not saying it's correct, but I was led to believe it was almost solely based on the motor as well.
It's a relationship between the two. Underhung describes a situation where the coil is decidedly shorter than the top plate. You can take a motor with a thick top plate and put a coil with a short wind width in it and it will behave in a very linear fashion. That is, stroke will increase in proportion to decreasing frequency (without enclosure influence). Take that same motor and stick a much longer coil in it and it will not only be considered overhung again, it will likely have a very high BL product. It's also very likely to have a very peaky parabolic BL curve due the number of windings in the gap decreasing almost as soon as the coil moves in either direction and will not behave as linearly as the short coil did in that same gap, or even a conventional overhung configuration with a long coil and short gap relationship.
 
This overhung driver has a tall top plate but it also has a long coil. It's designed to have a high BL product rather than the linearity of a short top plate with that same coil.

3HPcutaway.jpg


 
It's a relationship between the two. Underhung describes a situation where the coil is decidedly shorter than the top plate. You can take a motor with a thick top plate and put a coil with a short wind width in it and it will behave in a very linear fashion. That is, stroke will increase in proportion to decreasing frequency (without enclosure influence). Take that same motor and stick a much longer coil in it and it will not only be considered overhung again, it will likely have a very high BL product. It's also very likely to have a very peaky parabolic BL curve due the number of windings in the gap decreasing almost as soon as the coil moves in either direction and will not behave as linearly as the short coil did in that same gap, or even a conventional overhung configuration with a long coil and short gap relationship.
This overhung driver has a tall top plate but it also has a long coil. It's designed to have a high BL product rather than the linearity of a short top plate with that same coil.
3HPcutaway.jpg
Ok, I think I got it. So, to put it basically, linearity is derived from the amount, or maybe consistency is a better word, of the coil being in the gap? As as soon as the gap sees free space (the top coil extending downward past the top of the gap, or the bottom of the coil extending upward past the bottom of the gap, where there is still coil to the other side of the gap and possibly past it) linearity will decrease? Maybe I explained that weird, but I think I have it laid out in my head.

And based on that, that means either a very long or very short coil, depending on motor and top plate, can be equally as linear, correct?

 
Ok, I think I got it. So, to put it basically, linearity is derived from the amount, or maybe consistency is a better word, of the coil being in the gap? As as soon as the gap sees free space (the top coil extending downward past the top of the gap, or the bottom of the coil extending upward past the bottom of the gap, where there is still coil to the other side of the gap and possibly past it) linearity will decrease? Maybe I explained that weird, but I think I have it laid out in my head.
And based on that, that means either a very long or very short coil, depending on motor and top plate, can be equally as linear, correct?
Yep, I think you've got it.
To answer your second question, that's pretty much correct as long as we're strictly speaking about the motor (equals coil/magnet assembly). Soft parts will also influence the linearity depending on the intended purpose of the driver but that's a bit outside the scope of this conversation.

 
Yep, I think you've got it.
To answer your second question, that's pretty much correct as long as we're strictly speaking about the motor (equals coil/magnet assembly). Soft parts will also influence the linearity depending on the intended purpose of the driver but that's a bit outside the scope of this conversation.
Nice. Appreciate the tutoring bro.

 
Nice. Appreciate the tutoring bro.
Aw, no worries. And please do your due diligence to read more scientific articles about motor topologies, I'm doing a lot of generalizing for the sake of easier typing, lol. There are many many aspects to motors. For instance, we haven't even touched on the flux gap width. Another huge game changer!
This article does a small bit of explaining some things that weren't discussed here.

AE Speakers --- Superb Quality, Unforgettable Performance, Definitely.

 
Always a fun time to read Dan's posts //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif Printed out all of them that I could in college.
I would say that it payed off in spades, young man. Keep up the good work! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
 
Bringing this thread back to life for a few extra questions (thanks @gckless for reminding me this was here).

I'm planning out a build for when I have my reenlistment bonus handy. Vehicle will be an 00-02 Chevy Tahoe with a Zapco DSP-Z8 for processing. As for amplification on the sub stage, I'm considering either a Zed Minotaur II or Zapco Z-2KD (maaaaybe a 3KD), each of which will put out a clean 1.5k at 2 ohms. The overall goal is what most would consider SQL as in I'm looking for clean, accurate bass with a little oomph for when it's needed.

Now here's where the underhung question comes in hand. I've been bouncing back and forth between a couple underhung subs for this application and have about 6-7 cubes of space to play with (basically where the third row would be in a Tahoe plus a few extra inches into the cargo bay). I understand that you don't get a crud-ton of underhung subs expecting massive output and I'm not in the game to do hair tricks anyway, so consider that removed from my concerns as well. Anyway, here are two choices I've come up with so far:

1. A pair of 12" IA Flatlyne. Like how low Fs is on these and other T/S look impressive (guess I'm glad there's any T/S considering how hush hush IA is about their sub specs)
2. Have Murph from Tantric build me a HDD, but with an underhung coil. This brings power handling down to about 1K which would make it easier to drive on my amp choices.

Seeing as how I'm relatively new to the world of underhung subs, I'm just trying to get a feel for what sonic characteristics I should expect from most Daily Driver sub setups. In the past, I've run W3, W6, Infinity Ref/Kappa, ID10, and am currently on a DC Audio Level 2 10" in a slightly oversized box (makes it a smidge boomy, but I can handle it). I proposed this elsewhere, but am looking for a few guys' opinions on what to run without breaking the bank. Including the purchase of the Tahoe, I'm looking to spend no more than 10K.

As for music, I listed to just about everything, so want this sub stage to feel at home playing anything from Miles Davis to Mozart to Martin Solveig to Megadeth and everything in between.
@ciaonzo ; @sundownz ; @hispls ; @denim ; and @TaylorFade ; @SPLaudio ; looking for your opinions in particular.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

ciaonzo

5,000+ posts
TheContinental
Thread starter
ciaonzo
Joined
Location
WI
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
91
Views
11,360
Last reply date
Last reply from
audio_phill
IMG_5860.jpeg

Brendon Jenness

    May 8, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot 2023-12-02 161309.png

Doxquzme

    May 8, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top