It's a relationship between the two. Underhung describes a situation where the coil is decidedly shorter than the top plate. You can take a motor with a thick top plate and put a coil with a short wind width in it and it will behave in a very linear fashion. That is, stroke will increase in proportion to decreasing frequency (without enclosure influence). Take that same motor and stick a much longer coil in it and it will not only be considered overhung again, it will likely have a very high BL product. It's also very likely to have a very peaky parabolic BL curve due the number of windings in the gap decreasing almost as soon as the coil moves in either direction and will not behave as linearly as the short coil did in that same gap, or even a conventional overhung configuration with a long coil and short gap relationship.So based on this, underhung/overhung has nothing to do with the actual motor, but only the coil? I hear people all the time saying underhung motor. Not saying it's correct, but I was led to believe it was almost solely based on the motor as well.
It's a relationship between the two. Underhung describes a situation where the coil is decidedly shorter than the top plate. You can take a motor with a thick top plate and put a coil with a short wind width in it and it will behave in a very linear fashion. That is, stroke will increase in proportion to decreasing frequency (without enclosure influence). Take that same motor and stick a much longer coil in it and it will not only be considered overhung again, it will likely have a very high BL product. It's also very likely to have a very peaky parabolic BL curve due the number of windings in the gap decreasing almost as soon as the coil moves in either direction and will not behave as linearly as the short coil did in that same gap, or even a conventional overhung configuration with a long coil and short gap relationship.
Ok, I think I got it. So, to put it basically, linearity is derived from the amount, or maybe consistency is a better word, of the coil being in the gap? As as soon as the gap sees free space (the top coil extending downward past the top of the gap, or the bottom of the coil extending upward past the bottom of the gap, where there is still coil to the other side of the gap and possibly past it) linearity will decrease? Maybe I explained that weird, but I think I have it laid out in my head.This overhung driver has a tall top plate but it also has a long coil. It's designed to have a high BL product rather than the linearity of a short top plate with that same coil.
Yep, I think you've got it.Ok, I think I got it. So, to put it basically, linearity is derived from the amount, or maybe consistency is a better word, of the coil being in the gap? As as soon as the gap sees free space (the top coil extending downward past the top of the gap, or the bottom of the coil extending upward past the bottom of the gap, where there is still coil to the other side of the gap and possibly past it) linearity will decrease? Maybe I explained that weird, but I think I have it laid out in my head.
And based on that, that means either a very long or very short coil, depending on motor and top plate, can be equally as linear, correct?
Nice. Appreciate the tutoring bro.Yep, I think you've got it.
To answer your second question, that's pretty much correct as long as we're strictly speaking about the motor (equals coil/magnet assembly). Soft parts will also influence the linearity depending on the intended purpose of the driver but that's a bit outside the scope of this conversation.
Aw, no worries. And please do your due diligence to read more scientific articles about motor topologies, I'm doing a lot of generalizing for the sake of easier typing, lol. There are many many aspects to motors. For instance, we haven't even touched on the flux gap width. Another huge game changer!Nice. Appreciate the tutoring bro.
Always a fun time to read Dan's posts //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif Printed out all of them that I could in college.I'll leave it alone after this - some very technical talk between some of the star designers of the lowest distortion topologies on the planet, LMS and XBL^2.
Any 21’s on the horizon with XBL^X?
I would say that it payed off in spades, young man. Keep up the good work! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifAlways a fun time to read Dan's posts //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif Printed out all of them that I could in college.
Elaborate please?tempest